|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 14:32:03 GMT -8
I highly doubt this is the answer. Then what's the alternative? Swamped was a Wolf and now you are? Unless you think Kawl is lying, I'm lying, Fran is lying, AND Crimson is lying then it means you are whatever Swamped was. and given her early claim that contradicted Tim, I think she is most likely the Tanner and was hoping to get lynched for the false claim. I think Kawl is lying and he is separate from the rest of you. Swamped being coy can mean she was evil, it can also mean she thinks someone is full of shit too and isn't taking bait. Town isn't always going to jump to dunk the truth. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 14:32:18 GMT -8
**could
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:32:58 GMT -8
I highly doubt this is the answer. Then what's the alternative? Swamped was a Wolf and now you are? Unless you think Kawl is lying, I'm lying, Fran is lying, AND Crimson is lying then it means you are whatever Swamped was. and given her early claim that contradicted Tim, I think she is most likely the Tanner and was hoping to get lynched for the false claim. techincally the logic in your original post breaks down if just me or Fran are lying. It doesn't require 4 to be lying. If I were to be lying (from sorians point of view) he doesn't have swampeds cars. If Fran is lying then swamped has his original card and not tanners wife from the beginning. Also as swamped is now the tanners wife she would not be pushing to lynch wolf!sorian that's a loss for the tanners wife. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:33:37 GMT -8
If they are masons, why the robber claim? Because otherwise Crimson couldn't have become a mason. Only if he robs Sorian. this hypothetical is if sorian did not start as a mason. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 14:35:23 GMT -8
Because otherwise Crimson couldn't have become a mason. Only if he robs Sorian. this hypothetical is if sorian did not start as a mason. I can assure you he did. 100%. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:35:50 GMT -8
Then what's the alternative? Swamped was a Wolf and now you are? Unless you think Kawl is lying, I'm lying, Fran is lying, AND Crimson is lying then it means you are whatever Swamped was. and given her early claim that contradicted Tim, I think she is most likely the Tanner and was hoping to get lynched for the false claim. I think Kawl is lying and he is separate from the rest of you. Swamped being coy can mean she was evil, it can also mean she thinks someone is full of shit too and isn't taking bait. Town isn't always going to jump to dunk the truth. nah I disagree. generally its wolves and tanners who are more hesitant to believe whether they got switched or not as they have the burden of extra info and the decision to make on whether to divulge it or not. Town is usually pretty happy to go along with it. |
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Dec 20, 2016 14:36:20 GMT -8
I suppose it's possible that Crimson could be lying about the role he got based on what Melon already said at the start of the thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:36:55 GMT -8
this hypothetical is if sorian did not start as a mason. I can assure you he did. 100%. i understand that's your position, and I'm leaning more towards believing it than not, but that's not the universe that conversation was taking place in. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:37:49 GMT -8
I suppose it's possible that Crimson could be lying about the role he got based on what Melon already said at the start of the thread. sure but that's dependent on both melon and Crimson lying versus just sorian lying. I can tell you which way my scales lean. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 14:39:32 GMT -8
I suppose it's possible that Crimson could be lying about the role he got based on what Melon already said at the start of the thread. But in that scenario, Crimson would be Tanner how does claiming mason in verifying my story help Tanner get lynched? |
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Dec 20, 2016 14:42:06 GMT -8
I just want to know what was behind Card 1. Notice how Tim doesn't really care about that, even though he should apparently.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:44:39 GMT -8
Think it's best to wait for the missing three claims before airing that info
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 14:45:20 GMT -8
Swamp pls. I asked saw about that his ago. This is the first time you've mentioned it.
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 14:45:48 GMT -8
His = hours
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:47:50 GMT -8
Watching the drunks fight is my favorite college pastime...
Please continue you two
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 14:58:35 GMT -8
Level -1 fight
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 15:20:47 GMT -8
Zzzzzz
|
|
|
|
Post by Flush on Dec 20, 2016 15:25:57 GMT -8
For some reason OG is a hot mess on my laptop (regardless of browser) so I have to use my phone. Which doesn't make following this shit any easier...
Anyway, I woke up as Doppelganger, chose Swamped, got Drunk and switched with card 2.
So CzarTim should be lying I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by natiko on Dec 20, 2016 15:26:14 GMT -8
Let's just all vote Cabot and call it a day.
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 15:32:42 GMT -8
For some reason OG is a hot mess on my laptop (regardless of browser) so I have to use my phone. Which doesn't make following this shit any easier... Anyway, I woke up as Doppelganger, chose Swamped, got Drunk and switched with card 2. So CzarTim should be lying I guess. Uh... |
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 15:32:44 GMT -8
For some reason OG is a hot mess on my laptop (regardless of browser) so I have to use my phone. Which doesn't make following this shit any easier... Anyway, I woke up as Doppelganger, chose Swamped, got Drunk and switched with card 2. So CzarTim should be lying I guess. Why does this feel like a claim meant to prove Swamped more than the actual truth? |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 15:35:21 GMT -8
Yea not buying that one at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 15:36:03 GMT -8
This is silly. So it's Royal a doppled tanner or did swamped start as a wolf?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 15:38:01 GMT -8
Could be minion as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 15:39:21 GMT -8
Yeah that was what I was implying with the latter. "Clear" swamped / sorian.
|
|
|
|
Post by franconp on Dec 20, 2016 15:43:57 GMT -8
He also choose the only card the seer didn't saw. Not buying it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Flush on Dec 20, 2016 15:44:11 GMT -8
Did I get this right? Assuming everyone is telling the truth (literally impossible) we have the following scenario:
Royal_Flush - Doppelganger -> Drunk (Swamped) ->? (card 2)
Sawneeks - Seer:? (card 1) and Tanner's Wife (card 3)
Melonrabbit - Mason: Sorian
Sorian - Tanner -> Robber (CrimsonFist) -> Tanner's Wife (card 3) -> Drunk (Swamped)
CrimsonFist - Robber -> Tanner (Sorian)
Franconp - Witch: Tanner's Wife (card 3) and Robber (Sorian)
Kawl_USC - Troublemaker: Tanner's Wife (Sorian) and Drunk (Swamped)
CzarTim - Drunk ->? (card 1)
Swamped - Drunk -> Tanner's Wife (Sorian) ->? (card 1)
StanleyPalmtree -?
Cabot -?
Missing:
Alpha Wolf
Mystic Wolf
Minion
Villager
Mason 2 (or Tanner if we believe Melonrabbit and Sorian is mason 2)
|
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 15:46:25 GMT -8
Surely Stan will solve this for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 15:52:08 GMT -8
Surely Stan will solve this for us. We all know Stan is going to show up and say villager anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 15:55:34 GMT -8
From the above and what I know to be true. I'm inclined to believe sawneeks and Fran and likely crimson. Because if crimson had the tanner card he certainly isnt doing much tof win. Also, I'm skeptical of the final Sorian swap and royal's claim.
|
|
