|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:44:45 GMT -8
it's been over a year now and people still confuse swamped and i? smh just another reason to ignore sorian The pain will go away with time friend |
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Dec 20, 2016 13:45:15 GMT -8
Why do you keep saying you believe people before we have all the info? level 5 players trap that you just walked right into, smh I'm honored you think I'm level 5. I believe in you. I believe in all of you. Well, claiming insomniac and also ending up as insomniac seems like too dangerous a claim for a wolf to make. Unless of course the insomniac saw that he actually became a wolf..hmmm. Still, I can see that Natiko might have been an untouched player during the night. |
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 13:45:25 GMT -8
#3 for a reason
|
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 13:46:11 GMT -8
That backstab. How do you explain Crimson's claim? Someone claiming something using info already in the thread? Why, that's a tactic I've never heard of. Why would I randomly claim mansons with you, of all things? Cause of Fran? I breadcrumbed my claim prior anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 13:46:51 GMT -8
level 5 players trap that you just walked right into, smh I'm honored you think I'm level 5. I believe in you. I believe in all of you. Well, claiming insomniac and also ending up as insomniac seems like too dangerous a claim for a wolf to make. Unless of course the insomniac saw that he actually became a wolf..hmmm. Still, I can see that Natiko might have been an untouched player during the night. That was the second time you've felt the need to say you trust someone's claim though. |
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 13:46:59 GMT -8
Oh, RIP, Sawneeks then, same difference >_>
I powered through 6 pages fast and I just woke up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:46:59 GMT -8
level 5 players trap that you just walked right into, smh I'm honored you think I'm level 5. I believe in you. I believe in all of you. Well, claiming insomniac and also ending up as insomniac seems like too dangerous a claim for a wolf to make. Unless of course the insomniac saw that he actually became a wolf..hmmm. Still, I can see that Natiko might have been an untouched player during the night. lone wolf seeing it as card 2 would be out of the question either |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:48:22 GMT -8
That backstab. How do you explain Crimson's claim? Someone claiming something using info already in the thread? Why, that's a tactic I've never heard of. far more often is some one just bald face lying when their goose is cooked due to an unfortunate series of actions. Take a gander at which I think is more likely here. |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Dec 20, 2016 13:48:25 GMT -8
Natiko getting hit by the Alpha and seeing his new wolf card also isn't totally crazy.
but at the moment i don't think he is a wolf so
|
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Dec 20, 2016 13:49:42 GMT -8
Swamped is probably the tanner tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:49:47 GMT -8
Has Fran checked in since saw revealed tanners wife was a card that she looked at?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 13:49:55 GMT -8
Someone claiming something using info already in the thread? Why, that's a tactic I've never heard of. Why would I randomly claim mansons with you, of all things? Cause of Fran? I breadcrumbed my claim prior anyway. Have you pointed out any such breadcrumb or is this just one of those "hey, I said a vague thing, trust me." As for why, hell if I know, the one example I can think of I gave already. It's not the best play from any angle I can slice it. |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Dec 20, 2016 13:50:05 GMT -8
#sickgutreads
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 13:52:01 GMT -8
Someone claiming something using info already in the thread? Why, that's a tactic I've never heard of. far more often is some one just bald face lying when their goose is cooked due to an unfortunate series of actions. Take a gander at which I think is more likely here. Is my goose cooked? Just because I got switched a bunch doesn't really mean much, assuming truth from everyone involved with me, it's still just the odds of did you make me a wolf with your switch and the other person you switched me with could just confirm or deny that. (I don't even remember if you claimed who you switched me with because I put you on ignore almost straight away, mentally. |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Dec 20, 2016 13:52:11 GMT -8
Has Fran checked in since saw revealed tanners wife was a card that she looked at? No and cabot just sort of disappeared too |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:52:43 GMT -8
Alright since both players are here and kicking around, the other person I swapped was Swamped.
Sorry sorian. You probably got a stinker of a card now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:53:45 GMT -8
far more often is some one just bald face lying when their goose is cooked due to an unfortunate series of actions. Take a gander at which I think is more likely here. Is my goose cooked? Just because I got switched a bunch doesn't really mean much, assuming truth from everyone involved with me, it's still just the odds of did you make me a wolf with your switch and the other person you switched me with could just confirm or deny that. (I don't even remember if you claimed who you switched me with because I put you on ignore almost straight away, mentally. yea but it be hooves you to start tearing at the credibility of any moves made to your card before you can piece together how you ended up. And don't worry the immediate mental ignore is mutual. |
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 13:54:07 GMT -8
So Swamped does know what I was, that psychic read.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:55:47 GMT -8
So Swamped does know what I was, that psychic read. you don't get credit for that. That's not how this works. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 13:56:02 GMT -8
Why would I randomly claim mansons with you, of all things? Cause of Fran? I breadcrumbed my claim prior anyway. Have you pointed out any such breadcrumb or is this just one of those "hey, I said a vague thing, trust me." As for why, hell if I know, the one example I can think of I gave already. It's not the best play from any angle I can slice it. Lying about what you were and no you don't even know what you are. Sad. I'm not sure you've completely thought out your fake tanner claim. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:57:59 GMT -8
Shit what if you guys are all wolves.
I've been bamboozled.
I'm on to you Mazre!
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Dec 20, 2016 13:58:21 GMT -8
level 6 mod
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 13:59:16 GMT -8
Also swamped come back and play. There's a 50% chance your a tanners wife now which is like totally an okay card. And 50% that you are some other totally fine role as well. Come help us lynch sorian if he deserves it now.
|
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 20, 2016 13:59:26 GMT -8
Has Fran checked in since saw revealed tanners wife was a card that she looked at? No and cabot just sort of disappeared too Cab is chasing that white elephant. |
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 20, 2016 13:59:26 GMT -8
Have you pointed out any such breadcrumb or is this just one of those "hey, I said a vague thing, trust me." As for why, hell if I know, the one example I can think of I gave already. It's not the best play from any angle I can slice it. Lying about what you were and no you don't even know what you are. Sad. I'm not sure you've completely thought out your fake tanner claim. I never pretended to even have the thought that I'd know what I was before the day phase ended, I'm a magnet. |
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Dec 20, 2016 13:59:33 GMT -8
So we are only waiting on Stan and Royal.
And Cabot's claim
|
|
|
|
Post by natiko on Dec 20, 2016 14:00:00 GMT -8
I can promise you I'm not making some gambit. I am and always have been the insomniac. At this point I'm just pondering if it's worth trying to untangle the mess that is Sorian or if one of the other liars being a wolf playing at minion/tanner is the better gamble.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Dec 20, 2016 14:00:45 GMT -8
I would totally lynch Sorian.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 20, 2016 14:02:04 GMT -8
I would totally lynch Sorian. not gonna elaborate? |
|
|
|
Post by franconp on Dec 20, 2016 14:02:31 GMT -8
I'm here now. Was in my commute and just read all.
I will vouch for Sawneeks. Card 3 was Tanner's wife. So if Sorian was Tanner it's hilarious.
|
|
