|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 21, 2016 4:38:29 GMT -8
So, if I don't believe Cabot and believe Crimson, Crimson is a wolf now? Yes, that seems like a weird combination to believe though. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:13:04 GMT -8
Yea cabbie coming in with that straight garbage suppose that's to be expected.
Stan still never dropped his role reveal? Lol come on man
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:15:03 GMT -8
As with your first lie, not sold on this one either. From my perspective, the only call here is melon as lone wolf and you as minion (at the start of the night). Card 3 going to me made her comfortable in claiming mason with me for some reason (the lack of a counter claim at this point is odd to me though, that seems like a random shot in the dark). You supported her claim hoping I'd double back if I was gambiting and now a new opportunity arises with this cross claim from Kawl and cabot. I latched onto Melon's claim hoping that she was telling the truth, since it would have been difficult to disprove. why the Dorian part of th claim then instead of just saying yea I robbed melon and she was mason? Wanting to throw suspicion on sorian over melon? |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:20:39 GMT -8
Man, who do I believe more, cabot or Kawl. Kawl seems like a natural bait so far but cabot didn't target me and let's be real, every PR probably targetted me. zzz get over yourself. But you are right about me lying the bait. Now that Cabot's checked in I can at least be more truthful and with that info I'll probably be voting for sawneeks unless something changes due to Cabot's blatant lie. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 5:20:53 GMT -8
Sorry just woke up.
So if Crimson didn't rob Sorian then the mason card ended up as Card 3. And Sorian still got Tanner's wife.
|
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 5:24:53 GMT -8
Man, who do I believe more, cabot or Kawl. Kawl seems like a natural bait so far but cabot didn't target me and let's be real, every PR probably targetted me. zzz get over yourself. But you are right about me lying the bait. Now that Cabot's checked in I can at least be more truthful and with that info I'll probably be voting for sawneeks unless something changes due to Cabot's blatant lie. Why Sawneeks? |
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Dec 21, 2016 5:25:58 GMT -8
Man, who do I believe more, cabot or Kawl. Kawl seems like a natural bait so far but cabot didn't target me and let's be real, every PR probably targetted me. Well with this stunning logic, you can't go wrong. You betrayed your own Mason buddy in your first post, you're officially useless. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 5:29:11 GMT -8
Wait. Did Sawneeks ever reveal Card 1?
|
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Dec 21, 2016 5:30:27 GMT -8
Yeah, why sawneeks
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:35:31 GMT -8
Saw, yea whyneeks
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:37:14 GMT -8
Wait. Did Sawneeks ever reveal Card 1? no cause Stan also didn't claim. I'd probably be okay voting him as well. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 5:40:38 GMT -8
Thanks for being helpful, Karl... Doctor, I believe you are full of lies but I rather believe you. Also if we believe Crimson, Royal's dipole claim suddenly makes sense. Here's was we allegedly had at the beginning of the night. Doppelganger - royal Vanilla Werewolf - tim Alpha Wolf -  Mystic Wolf - Minion - Tanner's Wife - Card 3 Masons - Me and Sorian Seer - Sawneeks Robber - Crimson Witch - Fran Troublemaker - Cabot or Kawl Drunk - Swamped Insomniac - Naitko Tanner - Villager - Stan??? |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 5:42:24 GMT -8
Apparently my goal is to spell nothing right this morning.
|
|
|
|
Post by stanleypalmtree on Dec 21, 2016 5:44:28 GMT -8
ah nuts sorrys, yes i am vilager,
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:50:52 GMT -8
Thanks for being helpful, Karl... Doctor, I believe you are full of lies but I rather believe you. Also if we believe Crimson, Royal's dipole claim suddenly makes sense. Here's was we allegedly had at the beginning of the night. Doppelganger - royal Vanilla Werewolf - tim Alpha Wolf - Mystic Wolf - Minion - Tanner's Wife - Card 3 Masons - Me and Sorian Seer - Sawneeks Robber - Crimson Witch - Fran Troublemaker - Cabot or Kawl Drunk - Swamped Insomniac - Naitko Tanner - Villager - Stan??? by the by vanilla wolf means he was alpha'd and didn't start as a wolf. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:53:51 GMT -8
Sawneeks if you could share the card number one when you awaken I believe it's probably time for people to be truthful with their night actions?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 5:58:13 GMT -8
I could see an alpha wolf Cabot, minion Crimson, and wolfed Tim as the play here.
Crimson knows that Cabot is alpha wolf. Waits to hear who he targeted....but that would require Cabot to know who minion is to include him in his fake troublemaker to signal who he really wolfed. Maybe it's a lone wolf situation and looked in the middle so knows a card that isn't in play and sees Crimson claiming it. But that requires minion to have knowledge of a role in the middle at the start which he wouldn't know.
Ah fuck it I still like this theory.
|
|
|
|
Post by franconp on Dec 21, 2016 6:00:38 GMT -8
I believe that Sawneeks is really the seer. Card 3 was Tanner's wife. So, if there were no shenanigans, she is town.
I'm not sure about Stanley. Could he be minion?
|
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 6:08:42 GMT -8
I believe that Sawneeks is really the seer. Card 3 was Tanner's wife. So, if there were no shenanigans, she is town. I'm not sure about Stanley. Could he be minion? Seer and your Witch are the only two claims are fully believe. As I've said Royal claim is starting to make some sense. Not sure what to think about Crimson's new story and I still have no idea what Sorian is doing. |
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Dec 21, 2016 6:52:37 GMT -8
Thanks for being helpful, Karl... Doctor, I believe you are full of lies but I rather believe you. I keep reading this sentence and it hurts me. It's circular. Circular bullshit. Kawl has made his feelings a bit more clear. A counter claim like this and not voting for Me doesn't make any sense. Now he thinks I e got more hair than well, my current hair. Seriously why, yeah sawneeks? |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 6:53:37 GMT -8
Thanks for being helpful, Karl... Doctor, I believe you are full of lies but I rather believe you. I keep reading this sentence and it hurts me. It's circular. Circular bullshit. Kawl has made his feelings a bit more clear. A counter claim like this and not voting for Me doesn't make any sense. Now he thinks I e got more hair than well, my current hair. Seriously why, yeah sawneeks? youre smart enough to put the logic here together. I believe in you bud. I know you're on vacation but try to think on it a bit. |
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Dec 21, 2016 6:53:41 GMT -8
I believe that Sawneeks is really the seer. Card 3 was Tanner's wife. So, if there were no shenanigans, she is town. I'm not sure about Stanley. Could he be minion? Not turning up then claiming villager? Wow he did well as a minion. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 7:00:40 GMT -8
I believe that Sawneeks is really the seer. Card 3 was Tanner's wife. So, if there were no shenanigans, she is town. I'm not sure about Stanley. Could he be minion? Not turning up then claiming villager? Wow he did well as a minion. no one accused him of being the best minion. Not to mention get into levels. Shitty minion play could be great wolf play or fantastic minion play depending on what level people bite at fam. |
|
|
|
Post by franconp on Dec 21, 2016 7:00:56 GMT -8
i didn't say it was a good theory. What do you think he is? The villager? So why don't come clear with it the first time he posted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 7:02:47 GMT -8
i didn't say it was a good theory. What do you think he is? The villager? So why don't come clear with it the first time he posted. cause it maximizes the sketchiness of the claim. I feel pretty good on him not being villager but that doesn't mean much with all these sudoku type roles running amok. |
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Dec 21, 2016 7:03:57 GMT -8
Kawl please stop talking about levels
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 7:06:30 GMT -8
Kawl please stop talking about levels LEVELS JERRY But seriously wifom is just this concept but instead of hand waving it away as an inscrutable conundrum you can make an educated guess based on someone's general style of play. If I asked whether blarg or Stan was more likely to be on some multilevel play just out of sheer complexity who would you say? And that's not to say higher levels is better play most of the time it's not. But screw you guys this is my peeking esque hill to die on. Get on my level. |
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Dec 21, 2016 7:16:51 GMT -8
Thanks for being helpful, Karl... Doctor, I believe you are full of lies but I rather believe you. I keep reading this sentence and it hurts me. It's circular. Circular bullshit. Kawl has made his feelings a bit more clear. A counter claim like this and not voting for Me doesn't make any sense. Now he thinks I e got more hair than well, my current hair. Seriously why, yeah sawneeks? Isn't it enough to know I believe you, this one time, friend-doctor? He's never going to answer the Sawneeks question. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Dec 21, 2016 7:19:56 GMT -8
I've very clearly said what I'm waiting on to answer that question
|
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Dec 21, 2016 7:30:36 GMT -8
I keep reading this sentence and it hurts me. It's circular. Circular bullshit. Kawl has made his feelings a bit more clear. A counter claim like this and not voting for Me doesn't make any sense. Now he thinks I e got more hair than well, my current hair. Seriously why, yeah sawneeks? Isn't it enough to know I believe you, this one time, friend-doctor? He's never going to answer the Sawneeks question. Why do you believe me over kawl |
|
