|
Post by timeaisis on Aug 20, 2016 8:11:11 GMT -8
Melon has been the most active of the people who didn't comment on my questions at all. She avoided it entirely. Also what's with her recent post? She likes my style but still thinks I'm scum? Just reads as noncommittal to me. You're thinking way too highly of your questions strategy. Melon didn't respond to you, so what? People ignore others all the time in this game. Means little to nothing unless someone is directly ignoring a question related to themselves.
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Aug 20, 2016 8:11:46 GMT -8
Melon has been the most active of the people who didn't comment on my questions at all. She avoided it entirely. Also what's with her recent post? She likes my style but still thinks I'm scum? Just reads as noncommittal to me. I honestly didn't see the post you were referring. I do think your posting style is intriguing but the way your attempting to turn three letters into some kind of gotcha gambit to find scum is kinda absurd. Vote: Steve
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Aug 20, 2016 8:11:47 GMT -8
Vote: giantpanda[/quote]
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Aug 20, 2016 8:14:45 GMT -8
Melon has been the most active of the people who didn't comment on my questions at all. She avoided it entirely. Also what's with her recent post? She likes my style but still thinks I'm scum? Just reads as noncommittal to me. You're thinking way too highly of your questions strategy. Melon didn't respond to you, so what? People ignore others all the time in this game. Means little to nothing unless someone is directly ignoring a question related to themselves. He's "solving" though (even though yes you're right, he's technically not).
|
|
|
Post by Fireblend on Aug 20, 2016 8:22:18 GMT -8
Sorry Melon, just wanted to have a vote on someone before I went to bed and maybe get lucky with some reaction but that didn't happen... or did it!?
Anyway, Time, why do you want to be lynched so bad? Being openly anti-peeking turned out to be a pretty disastrous strategy for scum in mini-mafia 1, and jumping in defense of melon against Steve's strategy there seems funny. Not that I think Steve's strategy has much merit but I'm sure rabbit could've handled the suspicion herself. Something smells.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 20, 2016 8:34:48 GMT -8
Melon has been the most active of the people who didn't comment on my questions at all. She avoided it entirely. Also what's with her recent post? She likes my style but still thinks I'm scum? Just reads as noncommittal to me. I honestly didn't see the post you were referring. I do think your posting style is intriguing but the way your attempting to turn three letters into some kind of gotcha gambit to find scum is kinda absurd. Vote: Steve Eh, maybe. Your reaction and "omgus" vote tho...
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Aug 20, 2016 8:40:59 GMT -8
none of what Fireblend just said was true.
Mafia didn't get owned in Mini Mafia I because they were anti peeking they got owned because town played a lot better than they did. It's not productive to use people's personal thoughts about general mafia strategy as an indicator of alignment because when it comes to basic mafia strategy, most of the time, people are going to be expressing a view that they hold regardless of their alignment.
In the same vein it's not good to let people make large portions of their game contributions about things they would say regardless of their alignment, FOR EXAMPLE thoughts why they think peeking is good or bad.
And Timeaisis wasn't defending melonrabit at all melonrabit posted AFTER Timeaisis.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 20, 2016 8:42:48 GMT -8
Melon has been the most active of the people who didn't comment on my questions at all. She avoided it entirely. Also what's with her recent post? She likes my style but still thinks I'm scum? Just reads as noncommittal to me. You're thinking way too highly of your questions strategy. Melon didn't respond to you, so what? People ignore others all the time in this game. Means little to nothing unless someone is directly ignoring a question related to themselves. And you are thinking wayy too negatively of the importance of analyzing why people do what they do. My issue now is more so with her reaction to having a vote on her. At the end of the day my vote is on who I think is scum, whether you agree with my methods or not isn't something I care about.
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 8:52:59 GMT -8
Does anyone have any questions for me?
I put other Ouro away for a moment.
|
|
|
Post by Fireblend on Aug 20, 2016 8:56:34 GMT -8
none of what Fireblend just said was true. Mafia didn't get owned in Mini Mafia I because they were anti peeking they got owned because town played a lot better than they did. It's not productive to use people's personal thoughts about general mafia strategy as an indicator of alignment because when it comes to basic mafia strategy, most of the time, people are going to be expressing a view that they hold regardless of their alignment. In the same vein it's not good to let people make large portions of their game contributions about things they would say regardless of their alignment, FOR EXAMPLE thoughts why they think peeking is good or bad. And Timeaisis wasn't defending melonrabit at all melonrabit posted AFTER Timeaisis. That's not how I remember things. And people can just scroll up and see for themselves what Time's intent might have been on that post at the top.
|
|
|
Post by timeaisis on Aug 20, 2016 9:01:33 GMT -8
Sorry Melon, just wanted to have a vote on someone before I went to bed and maybe get lucky with some reaction but that didn't happen... or did it!? Anyway, Time, why do you want to be lynched so bad? Being openly anti-peeking turned out to be a pretty disastrous strategy for scum in mini-mafia 1, and jumping in defense of melon against Steve's strategy there seems funny. Not that I think Steve's strategy has much merit but I'm sure rabbit could've handled the suspicion herself. Something smells. If I get lynched over disagreeing with a town strategy, so be it. And I'm not defending melon as much as I'm calling out Steve
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 9:06:53 GMT -8
I really like this Time/Fireblend discussion. Really seems genuine.
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Aug 20, 2016 9:08:24 GMT -8
Several townies in MMI were anti peeking and mafia were pro-peeking in the thread once they understood the concept, town still lynched mafia. So you're not remembering correctly but that's not that important. f
what might Timeaisis's intent have been with his post? I feel like I need to understand this better:
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Aug 20, 2016 9:10:00 GMT -8
You're thinking way too highly of your questions strategy. Melon didn't respond to you, so what? People ignore others all the time in this game. Means little to nothing unless someone is directly ignoring a question related to themselves. And you are thinking wayy too negatively of the importance of analyzing why people do what they do. My issue now is more so with her reaction to having a vote on her. At the end of the day my vote is on who I think is scum, whether you agree with my methods or not isn't something I care about. Your methods *do* matter because as scum you, of course you know who's town and who is not. Your posts so far has you been latching onto someone that is active in posting with a vague follow-up on why not responding to your post, which seemed many to be a joke, is supposedly a scum-tell. No, I'm not going to just ignore the fact you've voted for me without much thought or reason. And yes, that stands out to me as a way to generate a mislynch.
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Aug 20, 2016 9:21:12 GMT -8
Day phases are 48 not 24 here correct? And sorry I was in Arnold as this started which went straight into drinking and going out with friends which lead straight to a hangover which is leading straight into picking up a present for a baby shower. Once I get over this hump I'll get up in this shit. Day phases are 24 hours.... 4-5 hours left
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 9:23:07 GMT -8
Ok then, I'm keeping my vote where it is.
Sorry, scumbuddy.
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Aug 20, 2016 9:32:06 GMT -8
VOTE COUNT:Giant Panda (2)Zippedpinhead Batsnacks Timeaisis (2)Giant Panda Ourobolus Steve (1)batsnacksmelonrabbit batsnacks (1)Gorlak Melonrabbit (1)Fireblend Kawl_USC (1)Swamped Splinter (0)melonrabbutLone_Prodigy (0)GorlakGorlak (0)Ourobolus
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 9:42:57 GMT -8
is swamped gonna get modkilled
|
|
|
Post by melonrabbit on Aug 20, 2016 9:52:46 GMT -8
VOTE COUNT:Splinter (0)melonrabbut Hyper please.
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 9:53:41 GMT -8
VOTE COUNT:Splinter (0)melonrabbut Hyper please. what your vote is on steve
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 9:53:52 GMT -8
oh, lol
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Aug 20, 2016 9:56:09 GMT -8
VOTE COUNT:Splinter (0)melonrabbut Hyper please. Does melonrabbut not not have a vote on Splinter? I don't see the problem here melonrabbit
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Aug 20, 2016 10:17:52 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by timeaisis on Aug 20, 2016 10:30:00 GMT -8
I guess I should vote now in case I can't for day end.
Vote: Steve
I'm leaning towards: Steve Kawl Giant Panda
Last two because I feel like I haven't heard much from them. Steve because of the game weirdness.
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 10:33:40 GMT -8
C'mon guys, let's get Time.
And then Fireblend.
And then Giant Panda.
|
|
|
Post by timeaisis on Aug 20, 2016 10:37:27 GMT -8
Oh Ouro, what do you have against me
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 10:38:19 GMT -8
i broke the wordcount typing up the list
|
|
|
Post by timeaisis on Aug 20, 2016 10:39:20 GMT -8
then make it a twofer
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 10:39:59 GMT -8
i'm tired
you guys are just gonna have to trust my sick gut reads
|
|
|
Post by Ourobolus on Aug 20, 2016 10:42:37 GMT -8
Dammit, Ouro, I thought I told you to contribute!
|
|