|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 8, 2016 7:09:09 GMT -8
Def Worthy. Sucks about those party poopers. Kinda late now as I'm almost done with work for you foreseeable future, but would some sort of private voice chat be kosher? Is this question directed at me? And if so, define private voice chat. Like a discord chat we or you open. Not terribly important now, the thought just crossed my mind. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 8, 2016 7:15:01 GMT -8
Ignore it if you have any objections. I thought about using it in the car, but I don't think I'll be driving for much longer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrabyte20xx on Jun 8, 2016 7:34:34 GMT -8
It's not that I'm against it, but I would want to confer with the rest of the mods. By the time that's done it might be a moot point though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 8, 2016 8:08:47 GMT -8
Thanks Flush. I agree he's definitely not scum.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jun 8, 2016 8:13:57 GMT -8
TWE isn't Scum. Maybe a lost partner or something but unless he chose to ignore the Scum chat or the whole Scum team is completely incompetent there is no way this is a Scum gambit. Come on. we did it reddit |
|
|
|
Post by Terrabyte20xx on Jun 8, 2016 8:31:05 GMT -8
Okay, we talked and we are going to Veto the voice chat, sorry.
|
|
|
|
Post by Retro on Jun 8, 2016 8:44:34 GMT -8
Hey all, I'm a little delayed on this, but here is the standard disclaimer:
-Your posts in here will not increase your displayed post count. If you notice otherwise, PM me immediately.
-Only people who already have access to this chat can search your posts.
-You are as safe as we can make you.
Carry on.
|
|
|
|
Post by ultron87 on Jun 8, 2016 9:21:37 GMT -8
Good work on the perfect gambit, TWE.  You're off the hook and we've got the "look at these bandwagoners!" conversation going. |
|
|
|
Post by theworthyedge on Jun 8, 2016 9:53:48 GMT -8
I want to say that was planned...lol Now. Let's go kick some ass.
|
|
|
|
Post by gryvan on Jun 8, 2016 12:42:33 GMT -8
just as a precaution for the following days, I think either darryl or flame will probably go full circle towards you again TWE maybe around day 3 or so, so we might need to think up some counter measures just in case
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 8, 2016 12:50:45 GMT -8
just as a precaution for the following days, I think either darryl or flame will probably go full circle towards you again TWE maybe around day 3 or so, so we might need to think up some counter measures just in case We could just NK Darryl  |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 8, 2016 16:24:41 GMT -8
Who would you guys like to see lynched?
It seems to be a fight between Xam and Flush with perhaps Flame and Ultron behind them, but it could end up being someone else.
I'm not sure how much steam the Flush train has left, but I would prefer to see him lynched over Xam.
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jun 8, 2016 22:38:46 GMT -8
Who would you guys like to see lynched? It seems to be a fight between Xam and Flush with perhaps Flame and Ultron behind them, but it could end up being someone else. I'm not sure how much steam the Flush train has left, but I would prefer to see him lynched over Xam. I would prefer Flush. The case against him feels quite a bit weaker than the one against Xam to me, yet also more justifiable for a D1 vote (because on D1 we would totally lynch somebody for a stupid typo). It would be much easier imo for some of us to go after him and not look too suspicious. |
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jun 8, 2016 22:40:00 GMT -8
It's also slightly concerning that Blarg has 3 of us on his scum list. Still, it's only D1 so that shouldn't be too bad?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 8, 2016 23:04:46 GMT -8
It's also slightly concerning that Blarg has 3 of us on his scum list. Still, it's only D1 so that shouldn't be too bad? Blarg pls. To be fair I've coaster hardcore today. Gotta step up my game. |
|
|
|
Post by ultron87 on Jun 9, 2016 3:57:19 GMT -8
Blarg's fight with me makes no sense and will fall apart if Royal dies. Not that worried.
TWE, I think I'm gonna toss a vote your way for the blatant role fishing. It hopefully doesn't catch on, but that was too suspicious to just ignore. And it'll set up some separation between us if either of us flips.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 4:24:26 GMT -8
Blarg's fight with me makes no sense and will fall apart if Royal dies. Not that worried. His "either way" makes it sound like he thinks you're suspicious regardless of what Flush will flip as. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 6:24:41 GMT -8
I think Blarg's scum read of Flush is a red herring like Darryl's read of Worthy.
|
|
|
|
Post by ultron87 on Jun 9, 2016 6:50:50 GMT -8
In response to your question I'm gonna post this:
"
True. TWE apparently returning to the "draw Danny out" well does recontextualize that initial "mistake". And certainly makes it seem less like a mistake. Maybe scum have some more info about Danny than we do and are willing to take some risks to get him?"
That seem fine?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 6:53:04 GMT -8
It is sort of contradictory to this earlier post:
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 6:59:47 GMT -8
In response to your question I'm gonna post this: " True. TWE apparently returning to the "draw Danny out" well does recontextualize that initial "mistake". And certainly makes it seem less like a mistake. Maybe scum have some more info about Danny than we do and are willing to take some risks to get him?" That seem fine? Hypothetical answer: I dunno. It would have been a risky gambit especially with Worthy staying silent for so long afterwards. His reply that he didn't realize the game had started also struck me as genuine. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 7:05:08 GMT -8
Sorry if I put you into a tough spot :Z
I just figured it'd look odd if I replied to so many people and then just ignored you and I didn't think it through.
|
|
|
|
Post by ultron87 on Jun 9, 2016 7:09:09 GMT -8
No worries!
I think the contradiction is why I mention the recontextualizing part. The evidence present in the thread means I have to now think both things are some risky mafia plot even if I dismissed the initial post.
I'm playing as townie who doesn't want to lynch people about things that look like mistakes and waits for actual suspicious stuff (which is also how I play when actually town). That's why I didn't want to bury TWE after that first post . Once there is actual evidence of the person doing something suspicious, it changes how I look at previous things that looked like mistakes.
It turns out the truth is actually half and half where the first post WAS a mistake, and the second one was an intentional thing from scum team, but I certainly can't really argue that line with what I'd just know from the thread.
I can drop this pretty quick if it doesn't pick up traction, which I expect will be the case. It seems like Blarg will argue the opposite side and he's pretty influential so I don't think it'll catch fire, unless the more quiet people in the thread decide to jump on.
|
|
|
|
Post by ultron87 on Jun 9, 2016 7:09:59 GMT -8
Us interacting in various ways positively and negatively is good. Don't want someone to be able to look at everything after one person flips and see "hey ___ never replied to ____ or ____".
|
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Jun 9, 2016 7:16:00 GMT -8
Us interacting in various ways positively and negatively is good. Don't want someone to be able to look at everything after one person flips and see "hey ___ never replied to ____ or ____". Yep, that's why I threw in my comment about TWE and StarSketch's "subtle" discussion about Darryl. And then Blarg and CB did basically the same thing after me. I feel so town right now. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 7:17:22 GMT -8
If it helps inspire you I came up with some possible answers: "The slip-up at the start doesn't have anything to do with his alignment." Or something more like: "I don't really see it as alignment indicative" But yeah, it's terrifyingly close to the truth You could also push the gambit theory, but I find the biggest hole to be that he almost had to have planned the backtrack in advance. It's hard to find a way that could have been scummy. You could also just back down? It's not that uncommon for town to go "yeah you're right" and it might put some distance between us should one be killed. |
|
|
|
Post by ultron87 on Jun 9, 2016 7:36:13 GMT -8
Backing down from it so quickly would feel more like someone in another chat telling me to do it.
I'll roll with it a bit more and can probably change my vote to someone else later and say I'm still suspicious of TWE. If I go down in flames at least it seems like the current running theory resulting from that would probably be that I found TWE as a town scapegoat to protect my scum ally Royal_Flush, so it wouldn't be some horrible disaster.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 7:36:43 GMT -8
Sorry, was on mobile and didn't catch your replies. No worries! I think the contradiction is why I mention the recontextualizing part. The evidence present in the thread means I have to now think both things are some risky mafia plot even if I dismissed the initial post. I'm playing as townie who doesn't want to lynch people about things that look like mistakes and waits for actual suspicious stuff (which is also how I play when actually town). That's why I didn't want to bury TWE after that first post . Once there is actual evidence of the person doing something suspicious, it changes how I look at previous things that looked like mistakes. It turns out the truth is actually half and half where the first post WAS a mistake, and the second one was an intentional thing from scum team, but I certainly can't really argue that line with what I'd just know from the thread. I can drop this pretty quick if it doesn't pick up traction, which I expect will be the case. It seems like Blarg will argue the opposite side and he's pretty influential so I don't think it'll catch fire, unless the more quiet people in the thread decide to jump on. I guess your reads can't be too good You be you. I'm trying to play like the townie I last played by trying to fill holes with questions. One of the things I'm worried about is that I have yet to town read anyone and I usually make some. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 7:37:10 GMT -8
Backing down from it so quickly would feel more like someone in another chat telling me to do it. I'll roll with it a bit more and can probably change my vote to someone else later and say I'm still suspicious of TWE. If I go down in flames at least it seems like the current running theory resulting from that would probably be that I found TWE as a town scapegoat to protect my scum ally Royal_Flush, so it wouldn't be some horrible disaster. Nah, I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jun 9, 2016 7:55:58 GMT -8
I've actually wanted to point out that Blarg is doing some real scum hunting for once, but seeing how confused people like Flush and Darryl appear to be I don't want to say it out loud.
|
|
You're off the hook and we've got the "look at these bandwagoners!" conversation going.
