|
|
Post by CzarTim on Jan 9, 2016 9:45:53 GMT -8
^ Thanks, Crimson. In that case, that could apply to an Islander or Evil Spirit role. My vote stays. This is true, tbh. Though not sure why scum would draw attention to themselves with that? |
|
|
|
Post by Bombay on Jan 9, 2016 9:51:04 GMT -8
I hate to be that guy who plays to character, but I find Mazre being so curious of the mystery star thing odd and am slightly suspicious. Don't worry Mazre, you'll win me over one day I was curious too. I don't think that's anything. It was weird for those of us who hadn't pieced it together. |
|
|
|
Post by LordofCastamere on Jan 9, 2016 9:51:34 GMT -8
Yeah okay. -Day 1 Blarg vote is such a safe scummy thing. Especially when he hasn't done anything against us yet. -Hasn't posted since Day start, Handwaves activity for the rest of the day. -More faux bullshit. Vote:Czartim this is non-sense. blarg is the most anti-town player in gafia, he could have the most powerful role and still be better off dead. we either lynch him or I put him on ignore. Or lynch me whatever it takes not to read another one of his posts, idgaf That's nonsense, and just as antitown as some of the worst things he's done. |
|
|
|
Post by Bombay on Jan 9, 2016 9:53:34 GMT -8
I know "frustrated with town" doesn't look good, but the number of soft claims this game is disconcerting and demoralizing. I don't know why we go through this every game. Also, re: blarg. My vote is not a joke. I would like to vote him out today. I know he'll just come back and reply with a clever gif because he's oh-so-wacky. But he loses games for town, he is distracting, and we'll likely lynch him anyway the second he gets bored enough to hijack the game. I like blarg because he's one of the few players I've seen to want to look outside of the box and put some serious work into it. He's good to have around from an opinion standpoint and isn't likely to rephrase public sentiment as their own. I want to wait for a scum tell on him. |
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Jan 9, 2016 9:54:44 GMT -8
Ignore it is then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Jan 9, 2016 9:57:08 GMT -8
Also, some quick reads before I have to do stuff: Town: LoC CrimsonFist Mazre SquidyJ (the saltiest Vanilla Towny) Sorian Scum: Roytheone I am the only scum suspect to you? No other people you find suspicious? Me and LoC lived with a snake for like a month, he was a nice fellow. I thought LoC was breadcrumbing his spirit animal, so I replied, because I thought I knew what he was doing. I also mentioned the scum team before anyone else did, capitalizing Evil to give it some emphasis. But Roy's reply makes it seem like he doesn't understand what's going on. Now, I have no idea if all islanders (be they ordinary or PR) have spirit animals (don't refute/confirm this). However, Roy's ignorance here stands out to me - he makes a reference to an old game instead. This reads like reaching to me. I thought it was fairly clear that Xam made an innocuous joke. I wonder if some people have the same animal buddy. That could mean something. Roy only mentions animals after Crimson replies to Zipped about Spirit Animals. Again, feels like he has no idea about this until after Zipped mentioned them. Incidentally, this makes me lean town on Zipped and Crimson (for now. I have no idea how spirit animals work, but right now I'm assuming only Islanders are affiliated with them). --- Roy also votes for Xam, whom I think is an easy target for scum to latch on to. So, I know it's not much, but I want to act on this uneasy feeling I have about Roy. Therefore I probably won't change my vote today, but keeping my eye out on others. So one of the reason you suspect me is because I was "reaching" when reaction to a post that was clearly an innocuous joke, but you are doing exactly that in your first point? And if you suspect everyone that didn't talk about spirit animals only after Crimson and Zipped talked about them, you would have like 25 suspects. Pretty weak case overall imo. |
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Jan 9, 2016 9:59:45 GMT -8
^ Roy, I know it's weak. It's D1, I have no irrefutable evidence. At least I'm not acting purely on gut, only 90% on it lol. But your reactions to those animal posts stood out to me. Sorry, but that's how I feel!
|
|
|
|
Post by Swamped on Jan 9, 2016 10:00:45 GMT -8
You vote on Xam still stands out to me. will dig up the latest vote count to see who else has voted for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by xamtheking on Jan 9, 2016 10:01:50 GMT -8
Roy, I have suspicions, but you're the only one so far I'm confident enough to put a vote on.
|
|
|
|
Post by nin1000 on Jan 9, 2016 10:10:24 GMT -8
Indeed, what should we do. I think we should lynch you. Ladies first, so I think you should go first |
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Jan 9, 2016 10:11:24 GMT -8
VOTE: Launchpad
You've been missing since we've started. Here, take my very powerful 1/16 vote as a drug to wake you up.
|
|
|
|
Post by xamtheking on Jan 9, 2016 10:12:30 GMT -8
*poses Coppanuva's comatose body in hilarious poses*
|
|
|
|
Post by LordofCastamere on Jan 9, 2016 10:18:34 GMT -8
Vote:Pop-O-matic
|
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 9, 2016 10:25:33 GMT -8
btw how do you guys like your vote counts?
1. List everyone
2. List everyone who has been voted, even if it was cancelled
3. List those that have active votes on them
Currently using option 3
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 9, 2016 10:28:56 GMT -8
Think 2 provides the best balance between info and no unnecessary work on your part.
But 3 gets the job done strictly speaking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 9, 2016 10:30:18 GMT -8
Don't mind me, its handled by a script. I just think option 1 looks cluttered without really adding info
|
|
|
|
Post by Kalor on Jan 9, 2016 10:30:30 GMT -8
I'm fine with 2 or 3. I guess option 2 would help with finding old votes easier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 9, 2016 10:34:50 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by xamtheking on Jan 9, 2016 10:35:26 GMT -8
Hey Splinter
It says Volcano Island Day 1 on the countdown timer here on OG
It's Day 9, can you please fix
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jan 9, 2016 10:42:34 GMT -8
I'm fine with 2 or 3. I guess option 2 would help with finding old votes easier. What do you think of the current lynch targets? |
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Jan 9, 2016 10:46:11 GMT -8
Roy, I have suspicions, but you're the only one so far I'm confident enough to put a vote on. Fair enough, but why not put those people you also suspect on your scum list? I am not asking to vote for them, but put them on your scum list or make a separate "probably scum" category or something like that. this is non-sense. blarg is the most anti-town player in gafia, he could have the most powerful role and still be better off dead. we either lynch him or I put him on ignore. Or lynch me whatever it takes not to read another one of his posts, idgaf So your vote for Blarg is 100 % based on meta gaming? He was anti-town in earlier games so lets vote for him! That's kind of a shitty thing to do. If blarg was being anti-town in this game I could agree with voting for him, but he has been remarkably low key for now. I am not going to vote for someone purely because of things he did in earlier games, that's stupid. |
|
|
|
Post by xamtheking on Jan 9, 2016 10:49:56 GMT -8
Roy, I have suspicions, but you're the only one so far I'm confident enough to put a vote on. Fair enough, but why not put those people you also suspect on your scum list? I am not asking to vote for them, but put them on your scum list or make a separate "probably scum" category or something like that. this is non-sense. blarg is the most anti-town player in gafia, he could have the most powerful role and still be better off dead. we either lynch him or I put him on ignore. Or lynch me whatever it takes not to read another one of his posts, idgaf So your vote for Blarg is 100 % based on meta gaming? He was anti-town in earlier games so lets vote for him! That's kind of a shitty thing to do. If blarg was being anti-town in this game I could agree with voting for him, but he has been remarkably low key for now. I am not going to vote for someone purely because of things he did in earlier games, that's stupid. I said they were quick reads, K My other suspects would probably be Blarg and Coppanuva (I know Coppa is not here right now. But I always suspect people who aren't here yet, not because I think they re scumming not being here, but rather that I shouldn't give them a pass because they weren't here) |
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Jan 9, 2016 10:56:55 GMT -8
So your vote for Blarg is 100 % based on meta gaming? He was anti-town in earlier games so lets vote for him! That's kind of a shitty thing to do. If blarg was being anti-town in this game I could agree with voting for him, but he has been remarkably low key for now. I am not going to vote for someone purely because of things he did in earlier games, that's stupid. But he hasn't posted anything of worth this game? He has as many useful posts as the people who haven't posted at all. Everyone giving him a pass "because he's blarg" is just as metay as me saying he won't be helpful. If anyone else made the posts blarg has made this game, they'd have 5 votes easy. |
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Jan 9, 2016 10:57:37 GMT -8
fucking quotes man
|
|
|
|
Post by triggergaf on Jan 9, 2016 11:00:05 GMT -8
Reading Final Fantasy mafia and a few previous gafia games was kind of a headache thanks to Blarg's posting style, but I don't find it distracting enough in this game to warrant a vote yet. Day 1 is always a weird phase. Most arguments seem pretty thin.
|
|
|
|
Post by cornb on Jan 9, 2016 11:02:32 GMT -8
So I am on page 22. Sorian says "town is at an information disadvantage, mafia is at an information advantage". This after providing a fuckload if information.
Sorian, are you scum and being nice to town so that we help you eliminate a competing scum faction?
|
|
|
|
Post by CzarTim on Jan 9, 2016 11:04:24 GMT -8
So I am on page 22. Sorian says "town is at an information disadvantage, mafia is at an information advantage". This after providing a fuckload if information. Sorian, are you scum and being nice to town so that we help you eliminate a competing scum faction? This is why I think he is neutral or lying about the whole "I can't say anything" thing. But unless something changes I doubt we learn anything lynching him today. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jan 9, 2016 11:04:48 GMT -8
Reading Final Fantasy mafia and a few previous gafia games was kind of a headache thanks to Blarg's posting style, but I don't find it distracting enough in this game to warrant a vote yet. Day 1 is always a weird phase. Most arguments seem pretty thin. What do you think of the other lynch targets? Déjà vu, but hopefully this time it won't be ignored. |
|
|
|
Post by Kalor on Jan 9, 2016 11:07:26 GMT -8
I'm fine with 2 or 3. I guess option 2 would help with finding old votes easier. What do you think of the current lynch targets? None of them really stick out to me in particular but I need to reread from the start as everything has blurred together at some point. I remember suspecting Roy yesterday but I don't remember why. Scrafty doesn't strike me as suspicious but I understand the reasoning that other people have. |
|
|
|
Post by Ty4on on Jan 9, 2016 11:12:06 GMT -8
What do you think of the current lynch targets? None of them really stick out to me in particular but I need to reread from the start as everything has blurred together at some point. I remember suspecting Roy yesterday but I don't remember why. Scrafty doesn't strike me as suspicious but I understand the reasoning that other people have. I understand Roy, but do you have anything concrete with Scrafty? Roy posted this tip, but in the desktop version you can click the search button to get options to search for individual users' posts. |
|
