|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 2, 2016 13:36:06 GMT -8
This game of noughts and crosses is intense af
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 2, 2016 14:13:38 GMT -8
Anything to be gained by pushing the idea that maybe the Mafia poisoned blarg and squidy was the product of a town/neutral power role?
|
|
|
Post by fat4all on Dec 2, 2016 15:07:25 GMT -8
Blarg seems pretty convinced that a townie poisoned them, but I dunno if they are going off of something specific or are just being Blarg :/
|
|
|
Post by fat4all on Dec 2, 2016 22:05:33 GMT -8
Man, when Blarg rips Blarg RIPS.
These are some hot takes.
|
|
|
Post by fat4all on Dec 3, 2016 2:48:04 GMT -8
fucking alt-right :\
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 3, 2016 8:41:11 GMT -8
So having allowed the day to start out anyone got strong feelings on who we wanna nudge as the person we lynch?
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 8:43:31 GMT -8
So having allowed the day to start out anyone got strong feelings on who we wanna nudge as the person we lynch? Dusk Soldier, Ynnek7, and infinit777 seem like they've flown by pretty safely thus far (as have yourself and fat4all). I think there's gain to be had in scumhunter there.
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 8:44:52 GMT -8
Ynnek7 and Dusk Soldier are getting attention currently. Zubz, maybe? StMeph?
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 10:03:42 GMT -8
Conspiracy time:
Anyone who would vote Blarg today is wasting their vote, and was essentially blackballed as a lynch target by squidyj for all intensive porpoises. Only one person voted Blarg prior to his poison claim. That person, Dusk Soldier, has kept quiet this whole time, and his vote on Blargonaut was both unexplained and seemingly useless.
Dusk Soldier poisoned Blargonaut, and his vote at the start of today means no one should suspect him
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 3, 2016 13:03:28 GMT -8
FATALITY
|
|
|
Post by fat4all on Dec 3, 2016 13:31:59 GMT -8
CM is basically done.
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 3, 2016 13:40:45 GMT -8
I've said that I'm leaning town on CM, not really sure how I can keep saying that without making some major stretches now. For the sake of consistency I'll have to have a think.
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 3, 2016 13:42:20 GMT -8
5 votes on CM with only bats having voted on him from our side, fair play.
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 13:43:06 GMT -8
I gave a weak inclination to believe CM, so I guess I'll have another battle with bats
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 13:53:20 GMT -8
shit, bats is convincing as fuck, well done man
I'll try another angle then
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 14:06:03 GMT -8
I almost don't want to post this because I'm afraid it might make too much sense for town:
"Is it worth going with Blarg's suggestion and voting Swamped instead of CM? If we're assuming that they're scumbuddies, it shouldn't make a difference who we flip; their fates are intertwined, so to speak. It's difficult to ascertain whether or not CM is really telling the truth, but if we try a Swamped lynch today, that could help us determine how CM will flip. Knowing that CM is town means he's probably not lying. As such, lynching Swamped would clear him and give us a safe townie to out to."
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 3, 2016 14:08:25 GMT -8
I'd rather you didn't fight my case unless you feel you absolutely need to. This was already really difficult to pull off I don't want to be fighting town and my team.
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 14:12:29 GMT -8
dude, that case is airtight. I legit can't find any way someone could get through that, but anything I could've come up with would've been weakass anyway. seriously, I tip my hat to you. you're a credit to the conspiracy.
puts me in an uncomfortable position, but I have two days left to vote, and I take my time anyway.
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 3, 2016 14:14:34 GMT -8
thanks also you started the CM wagon yesterday so it wouldn't be suspicious of you at all to vote CM today
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 14:18:09 GMT -8
I think I'll just be troubled for now
but get on my ass if you want
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 3, 2016 14:19:47 GMT -8
lewd
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 3, 2016 14:55:05 GMT -8
Hey bats, how much you think we should lay off attacking your case? Considering reiterating that I think them colluding is to blatant to be the case. Not got an interest in fighting this long term but for consistencies sake I don't wanna jump off him to soon.
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 3, 2016 18:26:00 GMT -8
I don't mind if you wanna do it but I'll tell you what I'm worried about.
If 1 person attacks that case it "enables" others to agree with them. The first to disagree has the hardest job and that is a daunting case, I want town to have to make that first difficult step. If someone does disagree with something I said I want them to feel like they're the only person who does. And I want them to expect to a miserable ordeal from me if they do disagree.
My opinion is that the response I would have to give you would not be worth reiterating your point right now, and the wagon against CM right now is pure town so you would have to deal with them as well. It's not really your job to defend CM anyway as town, it's his. You already have it on record that their colluding is too blatant to be mafia (which is only part of my case), I think you're well within your right as town to let CM handle himself.
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 3, 2016 20:08:06 GMT -8
oh, I remember what my attack was going to be. it was just going to be that this was exactly what you were doing and you were a hypocrite.
that was it. it was just an attack on your priorities and how you get aggressive and one-track minded. the closest thing I had to an attack on your argument is that squidyj's death is circumstantial evidence.
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 3, 2016 21:08:12 GMT -8
I'm not a hypocrite for "pushing who I think is mafia" I am town for doing that and it was CM's choice to claim not mine he brought this on himself. and I am aggressive and focused as town, this is how people expect me to play.
|
|
|
Post by fat4all on Dec 3, 2016 23:28:01 GMT -8
are you sure you're town, bats?
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 4, 2016 1:25:45 GMT -8
Makes a good case to leave it be bats,
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 4, 2016 4:15:48 GMT -8
Blatgonaut - So let's say he hasn't been poisoned. The only reason I see for this lie is he wants to ensure he makes in to Night 3, after all no one is going to potentially waste votes on him today with that claim. It's also allowing him to pretty much say whatever he wants and not be challenged today. Could be a gambit to get some discussion out or he could have something he wants to achieve in night 3. Just a thought.
|
|
|
Post by hobohodo on Dec 4, 2016 6:47:58 GMT -8
So Blarg is probably lying about the redirect stuff as he is saying he knows that bats did something that he redirected, but we know bats did nothing.
|
|
|
Post by batsnacks on Dec 4, 2016 8:31:25 GMT -8
He could be telling the truth. He might suspect that me/swamped are e.g. the cop and this is his way of telling us that our actions were redirected.
|
|