|
|
Post by eltopodelgaf on Dec 15, 2016 13:28:54 GMT -8
Congratulations on your win. Great performance by all of you.
|
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 15, 2016 18:04:35 GMT -8
Please don't punish me for the unfortunate formulation of your win condition. Play the game as reasonably and calmly as you have done so far. alright, Topo, I gotta know What does it mean?  ?? |
|
|
|
Post by eltopodelgaf on Dec 15, 2016 18:49:32 GMT -8
Oh, I just got a lot of flack for your abnormal win con. I had expected you to be at a (possibly severe) disadvantage and tried to help you by providing the override and (basically) a secret additional vote through your win con. I had feared for a blowout of scum, e.g. if one of you gets infected N1. I assumed that town would have to plan with (possibly) 5 scum anyway, so it would not make much difference. That said, it was not standard and I got (rightfully so) criticized for it.
Thankfully it did not really matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 15, 2016 18:51:44 GMT -8
Oh, I just got a lot of flack for your abnormal wincon. Thankfully it did not really matter. this is the least satisfying answer to anything I've received all week and I've said to people multiple times this week, sarcastically, "can you be less specific" |
|
|
|
Post by eltopodelgaf on Dec 15, 2016 18:56:02 GMT -8
Sorry. I'll try to be a bit more specific.
Normally, scum wins if it outnumbers all other factions together. Your win condition however ignored the neutral, partially to give you an edge, but also because I thought it would make things more interesting, without skewing the balance. It was also supposed to be a subtle clue towards the possible existence of a neutral and for you to not actively pursue the neutral player. However, abnormal mechanics or win conditions are usually not expected during the main season, so I rightfully got criticized for the win condition.
When I posted here, I feared that you would reach a point where this abnormal win condition would matter, e.g. by using your override ability. This could have led to (again, rightful) criticism of my game design and possibly an odd 4-1-4 situation. Thankfully this did not happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by drworm on Dec 15, 2016 19:06:44 GMT -8
ohhhhh, okay
so you DID mean to implicate the existence of a neutral with that, then
I guess we handled that right? since I picked up on it?
|
|
|
|
Post by eltopodelgaf on Dec 16, 2016 4:54:38 GMT -8
It was deliberately ambiguous, but *if* there was a neutral (or another faction for that matter), I didn't want you breathing down their neck. There could have been, for example, Sabbat as another faction.
|
|
