|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:05:20 GMT -8
Yeah, you were waiting to see if I was spilling the beans or not.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:07:49 GMT -8
Hey Burb!
How do you like our odds?
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:09:33 GMT -8
No, we don't get any confirmation.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:10:52 GMT -8
Does it go through if the target is killed? I say no.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 14:10:52 GMT -8
Yeah that is the better alternative, otherwise you would have to figure out two different results. (in response to flame fuck quotes)
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:11:40 GMT -8
This is important!
The person who doesn't get to do the action does get told by Burb who the other person targeted.
So I was told by Burb that you targeted Kark. And you were told by Burb that I targeted Ultra/BooBoo which is why you built a case against them.
Sound okay?
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:12:10 GMT -8
Oh oh! Do we dare say I targeted someone OTHER than Kark and he got switched?! SWITCHER ANTICS?!
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 14:13:17 GMT -8
~flashbacks from HYDRO CANON~
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:13:42 GMT -8
Fine... we won't
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:14:40 GMT -8
Yes, you can say that because I said "I can only assumed Coppa targeted Kark."
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:14:56 GMT -8
Or not, nevermind. Would go off the rails.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:20:24 GMT -8
To Ty4on's flavor question about Coppa and I not talking.
We used to be together, but not anymore. Now whenever we see each other, we just argue with each other incessantly.
Basically, the flavor states that whenever we're around each other, we vent and try to hide our unresolved emotions.
---
Sound fine?
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:20:52 GMT -8
Sounds good. I won't do the switcher thing, too insane.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:21:03 GMT -8
Flavor is good, go for it.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:27:39 GMT -8
You can still totally do the switcher, it's a prime time to hit if you want to.
The point about hitting Kark is going to hurt otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:30:42 GMT -8
Also, thinking about responding to Panda by saying:
"Well, I didn't target them, blame Coppa."
Might look bad though.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:31:56 GMT -8
Also, thinking about responding to Panda by saying: "Well, I didn't target them, blame Coppa." Might look bad though. Go for it. It was my choice, I did the switcher logic.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:32:25 GMT -8
This claim is so great, if we can even make it one more day, it'd be amazing.
And it's gone completely off the rails.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 14:35:07 GMT -8
in honor of our fallen comrades i dub this operation:
OPERATION LAMETHROWER
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:37:13 GMT -8
This claim is so great, if we can even make it one more day, it'd be amazing. And it's gone completely off the rails. Off the rails you say? www.youtube.com/watch?v=rulElJITIVYAlso Retroid what's your reaction to this?
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:37:38 GMT -8
So we're all in agreement that batsnacks is probably the real bomber? Don't target them once we're gone Kyan/Retroid.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:39:19 GMT -8
Was Retroid even around when we decided to commit to this gambit?
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:44:13 GMT -8
Was Retroid even around when we decided to commit to this gambit? I think he posted a laughing emoji yesterday when we were debating it. Also yeah I'm pretty sure batsnacks is the real bomber.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:49:44 GMT -8
Well, when he wins, he can thank us for getting the heat off of him.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:51:41 GMT -8
I do wonder why their bomb didn't go through... maybe the scum detection thing IS accurate
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:52:42 GMT -8
Hey when we go should we let town know the actual bomber is neutral?
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:54:10 GMT -8
I was thinking the same thing.
Didn't we think that the real bomber tried to hit Launch/Gorlak, and we killed them?
At the end, we can just say the Bomber really is neutral and it's Batsnacks.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:57:23 GMT -8
Yeah, might as well. I doubt town will believe us but if we can throw the neutral under the bus on our way out why not!
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:58:56 GMT -8
Should we bring up the possibility that there could be a blocker and we just don't know about it?
Might make our claim even sketchier than it already is though.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 15:07:24 GMT -8
Ehhh maybe, I mean I doubt they'd believe it though.
|
|