|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:22:13 GMT -8
...why does bats think you are a doc.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:22:20 GMT -8
Also Batsnacks should be an easy case as scum when Flame and I flip.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:24:07 GMT -8
...why does bats think you are a doc. Either he's the bomber, or is operating under the assumption that any other kind of claim would be insane (Which it totally is)
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:24:35 GMT -8
I did night 1 and 3, you did 2 should be fine.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:24:52 GMT -8
...Damn Kyan, I wasn't ready for that question yet . Flame! What're we doing? Bomb and go with SILENCE as the command?
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:26:13 GMT -8
I know. It will be asked at some point anyway. No need to hurry and answer all questions in a megapost. You can easily delay answering it for a bit.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:30:45 GMT -8
I'm thinking more along the lines of "Argue" or something like that, so we can actually use our own role name.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:31:49 GMT -8
I'm thinking more along the lines of "Argue" or something like that, so we can actually use our own role name. Sure if you want. Maybe say the flavor says some stuff about there still being love lingering between us or something if we want to.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:37:14 GMT -8
So are we really saying we are chat bomber right now? And are we gonna claim neutral?
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:39:42 GMT -8
So are we really saying we are chat bomber right now? And are we gonna claim neutral? If you wanna, I kinda wanna see how Kark handles Batsnacks' insane logic.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:40:32 GMT -8
Something like, our command name is "Argue:" and once per night one of us can start an argument near that team's boat, causing them to be unable to talk to each other while we are arguing?
Then we say that we're neutral, and our win condition is to interrupt 4 sets of players.
Then say that we think we hit mafia, as our action seemingly didn't work and point it straight at Ultra/BooBoo?
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:40:35 GMT -8
Neutral just kills you.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:42:24 GMT -8
Do you honestly think we have a chance of surviving more? I think if we sell our power as non-destructive, we might be able to last until this night and you can throw out a block and hopefully strike some fear out there during the day to draw attention away from us.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:42:29 GMT -8
Neutral might seem more credible but it does nothing to your survival. Bomber being town is less credible, but it makes you less likely to die, because town would not want to kill a pseudo-cop.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:45:04 GMT -8
If you claim town, yeah you die day five. If you would survive this day while claiming neutral, you could survive day five too. Your claim, your call.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:45:19 GMT -8
Neutral might seem more credible but it does nothing to your survival. Bomber being town is less credible, but it makes you less likely to die, because town would not want to kill a pseudo-cop. Idea, if we can get a Zipped lynch, we can have you block Kark at night and use the existence of a blocker to help shield us.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:49:16 GMT -8
Here's a draft:
A) what does the flavor say it does?
Coppa and I begin one of our infamous arguments in the vicinity of our target boat. Our arguing is so loud and annoying that the people we are with are unable to talk to one another. Despite our arguments, we actually do care for each other, sometimes we just have to vent.
B) what it's called?
The command is "Argue" or "Vent" (Which do you think is best?)
C) what/who did you do these things to?
I personally did it to El Topo/Giant Panda and Ultra/BooBoo. I assume Coppa did it Kark/Zip. I've targeted people who are active so that they will get out the existence of our role and so when we did have to claim, people would be around to discuss it. Now, you're probably surprised to see Ultra/BooBoo on that list of targets, and frankly, I was surprised that no one had stepped forward to claim the 'chat bomb'. I personally think that it's because the command does not work on mafia targets, as otherwise we'd be potentially disabling all of scum chat.
[highlight] Vote: UltraJay [/highlight]
You're caught Ultra/BooBoo.
You might now have well deduced that Coppa and I are not Lovers or Loveless, we are neutral and our name is the "Divorced Couple". We still have unresolved feelings for one another and do not yet hate each other. Our win condition is to successfully interrupt four boats. So we might be able to win tomorrow, though I don't know because I can't be certain that the Ultra/BooBoo action worked. ---
How's that?
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:50:20 GMT -8
I think neutral is our only bet, our 'power' makes no sense as a town role.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:51:37 GMT -8
I'm basically just hoping we can make it another day.
We can say that Kark could track us doing our interrupt to verify the existence of our role.
Then Kark could be blocked and we have a crazy Day 5.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:52:47 GMT -8
Ideally, if we can make it, then that makes it 6 v 1 on Day 6. Best we can do in this situation I gather.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:53:15 GMT -8
Here's a draft: A) what does the flavor say it does? Coppa and I begin one of our infamous arguments in the vicinity of our target boat. Our arguing is so loud and annoying that the people we are with are unable to talk to one another. Despite our arguments, we actually do care for each other, sometimes we just have to vent. B) what it's called? The command is "Argue" or "Vent" (Which do you think is best?) C) what/who did you do these things to? I personally did it to El Topo/Giant Panda and Ultra/BooBoo. I assume Coppa did it Kark/Zip. I've targeted people who are active so that they will get out the existence of our role and so when we did have to claim, people would be around to discuss it. Now, you're probably surprised to see Ultra/BooBoo on that list of targets, and frankly, I was surprised that no one had stepped forward to claim the 'chat bomb'. I personally think that it's because the command does not work on mafia targets, as otherwise we'd be potentially disabling all of scum chat. [highlight] Vote: UltraJay [/highlight] You're caught Ultra/BooBoo. You might now have well deduced that Coppa and I are not Lovers or Loveless, we are neutral and our name is the "Divorced Couple". We still have unresolved feelings for one another and do not yet hate each other. Our win condition is to successfully interrupt four boats. So we might be able to win tomorrow, though I don't know because I can't be certain that the Ultra/BooBoo action worked. --- How's that? Looks good to me. I'd go for Vent personally, it makes it sound slightly less antagonistic.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:53:55 GMT -8
Your power would make sense as a town role if you claimed that you know that the bomb does not work on scum. You would then be a cop that backfires when targeting a townie. But I dunno, both arguments are hard to sell, go with what you prefer.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:54:22 GMT -8
Think I should post now, or wait a bit. We only have another ~18 hours to swing this.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 13:55:33 GMT -8
Think we should go with Kyan's idea Coppa?
I'm leaning towards the neutral myself as I think we'd be shredded to pieces for claiming town.
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 13:55:51 GMT -8
Think I should post now, or wait a bit. We only have another ~18 hours to swing this. Go for it. I'll post a similar post to what you're doing pretty quickly to hlp sell it as us both working separately.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 13:56:11 GMT -8
If you don't post now, people will claim that you fell back to the scum chat to discuss things and write drafts.
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:00:04 GMT -8
Time to see how it goes!
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Mar 9, 2016 14:00:28 GMT -8
I think that was perfectly disorganized. Flame, we're pretty good at working together to seem like we're not.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Mar 9, 2016 14:01:27 GMT -8
obviously you saw flame's post and then got the courage to go forward with your own post
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Mar 9, 2016 14:02:00 GMT -8
Yep!
I'm really glad we got to use the "No Chat" claim, I think it sounds like a feasible role. Can only hope now.
|
|