If pop-o-matic is telling the truth, then I am not lying.
If Mikehawk is telling the truth, then Pop-o-matic is lying, I may still be telling the truth but not confirmed either way
roytheone is independant to pop's and My claim but is directly opposed to Mikehawk
Retro's claim is opposed to mine and Pop's. So if he is the seer, we are both lying. He looked at a player and not the center cards. I mean who does that (other than pop-o-matic)... say maybe pop is lying too...
No, if Mike is telling the truth, that would mean you also lied, since you said you saw tanner in card 4,and he claims to have given me the doppelganger role from card 4.
True, overlooked that.
Sorry if mike is telling the truth I am also a liar. or a lair. Not sure
So who IS telling the truth? maybe that troublemaker? I don't know. I still don't trust all these seer claims, especially since I saw the mystic wolf in the center. It unlikely that one of them is getting something right when the other "visibility" characters have already claimed and all that. Of course we have all claimed the same visibility characters and now are fighting it out to the lynch...