|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:15:43 GMT -8
i.e. don't say its best friends. But drop enough clues that we can verify the name cop. Could act like that is a town focused play, another reason for us to reveal?
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:17:22 GMT -8
Use it to verify the name check claim by Flux unless there's a consensus that the town wants your name now, just start it up without it.
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:18:02 GMT -8
And yeah, I like that idea, using it to seem town friendly verifying an important claim.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:18:28 GMT -8
Okay, I think thats a good idea. Blarg want to draft up our two entrance posts here? I say we remove the exact phrase of Best friends (just go with redacted, say we were going ot share, but would like to use it to verify this cop claim now).
|
|
|
|
Post by Blargonaut on Feb 14, 2016 10:19:47 GMT -8
alright
|
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:21:11 GMT -8
i.e. don't say its best friends. But drop enough clues that we can verify the name cop. Could act like that is a town focused play, another reason for us to reveal? Hmm... Could be a fun play. I wouldn't come out with the role name yet, until someone asks at least. And even then maybe just hint at it. I wanna see how people react to the name-cop role though. I think there's a good chance people doubt it, and we can maybe get them to kill him for us. The thing is once he investigates someone who dies and gives the town the name before they die, he's confirmed and too safe. If you bait, maybe make it a pretty obvious bait so we can cast doubt on him later?Act like you've never breadcrumbed before? |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:23:54 GMT -8
I know if I was a miller with this info and was revealing to try to be pro town, I would use it to check this claim. So I think we should use it to verify. The fact that our name is passable for a miller role helps with taht. Once we verify it, we can handle them however we like, killing/role block etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blargonaut on Feb 14, 2016 10:25:00 GMT -8
So do we give our name in our reveal now or do we use it to verify the name check claim by Flux? hmmm good question IMO, I say yes, we still say we're the 'Best Friends' If Flux et al. name-confirm us Tomorrow, their claim will still be doubted to everyone else since we had pre-empted their investigation results by telling everyone first I think  what y'all say |
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:25:48 GMT -8
Yeah go for it.
Also, I'm debating throwing a pressure vote on Time/Flux and asking them:
Why did you feel claiming in your intro post on Day 1 was a good idea vs claiming on Day 2 when you could actually have something to back you up?
Anyone think that's a particularly bad idea? I'd move my vote after they answer, but just to put some pressure on them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:27:22 GMT -8
So do we give our name in our reveal now or do we use it to verify the name check claim by Flux? hmmm good question IMO, I say yes, we still say we're the 'Best Friends' If Flux et al. name-confirm us Tomorrow, their claim will still be doubted to everyone else since we had pre-empted their investigation results by telling everyone first I think what y'all say I say if you decide to claim your name, YOU should be the one who actually says it. It'll be easier to pass it off as "Blarg is just blarg", whereas Kawl saying it might cause people to think of it as more of an anti-town move. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:27:43 GMT -8
So do we give our name in our reveal now or do we use it to verify the name check claim by Flux? hmmm good question IMO, I say yes, we still say we're the 'Best Friends' If Flux et al. name-confirm us Tomorrow, their claim will still be doubted to everyone else since we had pre-empted their investigation results by telling everyone first I think what y'all say They may still be doubted, but people will also wonder why we played so sub optimally. Especially you Blarg. Claiming our name is the optimal play as scum to keep doubt on TimeFlux, not claiming our name would be optimal as an actual town sided miller, imo. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:28:34 GMT -8
Yeah go for it. Also, I'm debating throwing a pressure vote on Time/Flux and asking them: Why did you feel claiming in your intro post on Day 1 was a good idea vs claiming on Day 2 when you could actually have something to back you up? Anyone think that's a particularly bad idea? I'd move my vote after they answer, but just to put some pressure on them. Do it, you said you wanted to be a bit of conversation steering/attack dog. That claim is garbage if true and deserves to be jumped on. Only reason I haven't is because we haven't made our entrance post yet. |
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:29:30 GMT -8
Yeah, I think we should keep the name a secret unless y'all are in danger.
I was thinking the same thing with throwing a vote on Flux, Coppa. We could just both do it, vote as our pair?
|
|
|
|
Post by Blargonaut on Feb 14, 2016 10:31:32 GMT -8
They may still be doubted, but people will also wonder why we played so sub optimally. Especially you Blarg. Claiming our name is the optimal play as scum to keep doubt on TimeFlux, not claiming our name would be optimal as an actual town sided miller, imo. Good point... so we'll withhold our 'Best Friends' name, then, and ask Flux to prove it |
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:33:16 GMT -8
Sure, he did answer. Also he said one of the reasons he claimed now was something he won't elaborate on now. I'm thinking it's actually an X-shot (unlimited use for a small game when we have limited uses on 1 of our powers anyhow seems OP). Maybe he's claiming now to try to bait protection early to get all his investigates off before he dies.
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:36:16 GMT -8
What do you all think about Flux doing this even though Time wasn't for it? Think Time might come in and help us out, clear it up?
|
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:37:26 GMT -8
Maybe... I'm debating switching my vote over to Timeaisis just for the sake of him knowing I have questions specifically for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:39:58 GMT -8
That change wouldn't accomplish anything, would it? Other than a symbolic change?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:43:38 GMT -8
Alright as cute as alternating lines would be for our reveal post time limits prevent that so I say I do the first half with your patented
*INSERT CATCH PHRASE HERE*
PREPARE FOR TROUBLE
AND MAKE IT DOUBLE
TO PROTECT THE WORLD FROM DEVASTATION
TO UNITE ALL PEOPLES WITHIN OUR NATION
TO DENOUNCE THE EVILS OF TRUTH AND LOVE
You come in here.
TO EXTEND OUR REACH TO THE STARS ABOVE
BLAAAAAAAAAARG
KAAAAAAAAAWWWWL
TEAM Kargonaut BLAST OFF AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT
URRENDER NOW OR PREPARE TO FIGHT
yo heads-up, me and Kawl are a Miller Tracker
We were originally planning on revealing our name for total parity, but would rather use this to test this dubious claim by Flux.
Something like that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:44:53 GMT -8
Also, whats our phrase for any megatons we drop? Activate phoenix down obviously doesn't make any sense here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:46:16 GMT -8
That change wouldn't accomplish anything, would it? Other than a symbolic change? Yeah it's entirely symbolic, but if the goal of my votes is truly to apply pressure I want to make sure town knows who I'm pressuring and that I won't accept their partner's answers for them all the time. Granted right now Flux is doing a good enough job answering it. |
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Feb 14, 2016 10:47:29 GMT -8
Fluxaisis is infinite-shot but they die automatically on day x. Or the role name is correct, but they are 1-shot bulletproof instead. Or since they are cops, they take their killer with them. Or something, my theory is that killing them would somehow be disadvantageous to us. They wanna tank the kill for town. Oh and he even asks the doc to not protect them lel.
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:52:55 GMT -8
Fluxaisis is infinite-shot but they die automatically on day x. Or the role name is correct, but they are 1-shot bulletproof instead. Or since they are cops, they take their killer with them. Or something, my theory is that killing them would somehow be disadvantageous to us. They wanna tank the kill for town. Oh and he even asks the doc to not protect them lel. I think the only reason he is saying for the Doc not to protect them is because we're all pushing hard against him for his reveal. Interesting ideas on their role. |
|
|
|
Post by Blargonaut on Feb 14, 2016 10:53:56 GMT -8
Okay, summary for Blawl:
- say we're Miller Trackers
- DON'T say we're 'Best Friends' (our role name)
- ask Flux/Time to prove their cops by asking them to investigate us?
Ready to debut, Kawl? I'm dropping intro post now (starting the 'PREPARE FOR TROUBLE' sequence, no claim until it's done)
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Feb 14, 2016 10:54:57 GMT -8
So we are gonna drag this out over like 15 minutes? Alright I'm fine with that. Lets do it big. Lead on.
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:55:09 GMT -8
Yeah, looks good Blarg.
|
|
|
|
Post by Blargonaut on Feb 14, 2016 10:55:44 GMT -8
Alright as cute as alternating lines would be for our reveal post time limits prevent that so I say I do the first half with your patented *INSERT CATCH PHRASE HERE* PREPARE FOR TROUBLE AND MAKE IT DOUBLE TO PROTECT THE WORLD FROM DEVASTATION TO UNITE ALL PEOPLES WITHIN OUR NATION TO DENOUNCE THE EVILS OF TRUTH AND LOVE You come in here. TO EXTEND OUR REACH TO THE STARS ABOVE BLAAAAAAAAAARG KAAAAAAAAAWWWWL TEAM Kargonaut BLAST OFF AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT URRENDER NOW OR PREPARE TO FIGHT yo heads-up, me and Kawl are a Miller Tracker We were originally planning on revealing our name for total parity, but would rather use this to test this dubious claim by Flux. Something like that? nah, I say let's alternate 60 seconds ain't a thing The longer we can drag this sequence out, the better I'll start with the PREPARE FOR TROUBLE line (since it's Jessie's) |
|
|
|
Post by Coppanuva on Feb 14, 2016 10:57:24 GMT -8
...Blarg your avatar is amazing.
|
|
|
|
Post by flameac on Feb 14, 2016 10:57:45 GMT -8
Nice avatar change on GAF Blarg, very subtle.
|
|
Burbeting
Vice Admin
Bear of Love
The obligatory (gay) bear of the society!
|
Post by Burbeting on Feb 14, 2016 10:58:26 GMT -8
To protect the world from devastation~
|
|
