|
Post by cabot on Feb 16, 2016 9:30:52 GMT -8
What's with Kark's hopeless attitude now?
I'm still having him as town, but its day 1, grovelling in it is a pain in the balls.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 16, 2016 9:32:37 GMT -8
Yeah that post was out of nowhere it seems? Complaining about too much meta talk? Or something else? Or just another NX scarring joke?
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 16, 2016 9:55:18 GMT -8
hey gorlak, voting on El Topo is my thing.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 16, 2016 10:09:45 GMT -8
Is the game really that slow? We're half way into D1 and it's not even peak time. Seems fine to me?
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 16, 2016 10:14:26 GMT -8
i dont think its slow, it just a got a bit humdrum when going hard on meta which i kind of caused maybe sorta.
Oops.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 16, 2016 16:44:39 GMT -8
Holy shit CornBro
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 16, 2016 16:46:48 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 16, 2016 16:51:49 GMT -8
Also would it be considered bad form to call out Xam for posting in our thread more than his own?
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 16, 2016 16:52:46 GMT -8
Also also I don't remember Panda signing up, so I can only assume it's Palmer.
Same goes for whoever you find next.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 1:12:06 GMT -8
he was involved in balancing this game I think
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 1:26:53 GMT -8
I need to post two songs today.
You're out about 4.
#loveisover
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 2:21:03 GMT -8
lol El topo. The guy just cant ever come off as town.
He always reads scummy to me. Always.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 2:39:13 GMT -8
What about our role vs the miller trackers?
If the trackers are indeed miller AND they have sleepwalkers to deal with, what is that pointing to? that seems inherently less balanced , thats two negatives to one positive.
So my thinking is:
1) There are multiple trackers 2) Maybe Blawl are legit, and they are hiding another power to balance out. 3) Blawl are half lying, they are trackers but they are scum 4) ??????
Any thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 3:25:36 GMT -8
I need to post two songs today. You're out about 4. #loveisover oops, sorry love All aboard
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 3:31:31 GMT -8
Shit, I should have gone with this oneAnd holy fucking shit new Wolfmother singles and presumably upcoming album why did noone tell me??
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 3:58:51 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 4:23:38 GMT -8
What about our role vs the miller trackers? If the trackers are indeed miller AND they have sleepwalkers to deal with, what is that pointing to? that seems inherently less balanced , thats two negatives to one positive. So my thinking is: 1) There are multiple trackers 2) Maybe Blawl are legit, and they are hiding another power to balance out. 3) Blawl are half lying, they are trackers but they are scum 4)   Any thoughts? Thats a good point I hadn't considered... So Occam's razor says its option 3 - they are also in conflict with Flux' claim. I don't know, I had been mildly town reading them, but maybe I was just enjoying their antics too much. I'm not going to seriously consider any of Blawtux until D2, but I think this is a point against Blawl. To be honest Miller/tracker felt like an odd combo from the start, but that felt a bit too meta to consider on its own.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 4:24:31 GMT -8
It's reasonable to assume we'll be a PR target of some form tonight, but I could see BLAWWWLLL tracking us (if legit o course). here's hoping the RNG gods are less humourous with our night action than they've been so far.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 4:34:29 GMT -8
What about our role vs the miller trackers? If the trackers are indeed miller AND they have sleepwalkers to deal with, what is that pointing to? that seems inherently less balanced , thats two negatives to one positive. So my thinking is: 1) There are multiple trackers 2) Maybe Blawl are legit, and they are hiding another power to balance out. 3) Blawl are half lying, they are trackers but they are scum 4) ?????? Any thoughts? Thats a good point I hadn't considered... So Occam's razor says its option 3 - they are also in conflict with Flux' claim. I don't know, I had been mildly town reading them, but maybe I was just enjoying their antics too much. I'm not going to seriously consider any of Blawtux until D2, but I think this is a point against Blawl. To be honest Miller/tracker felt like an odd combo from the start, but that felt a bit too meta to consider on its own. I agree with all your points here, love. I said in the thread, but I'm not touching TimeFlux or BLAAWWWL in D1, two claimed power roles that don't feel inherently untruthful yet. I don't have a particular plan to help prove themselves, I'm more banking on seeing the results on D2 and judging. I also mostly town read kawl, though he actually delivered on a bunch of reads which I'm tempted to consider scummy since he never does. Blarg is blarg, which at this point is essentially a null. My initial point of their introduction being so rehearsed being a positive holds less weight with me now. It could have easily been organised in scum chat, as opposed to lovers. I also keep thinking of what I brought up previously: 1) Millers have worked in GAFIA, I was NKed late. Bear was NKed when he revealed he had other powers. Actual scum going for a miller gambit makes sense considering history, and they did it the way you should do as miller. If we can count roy (lol) he lived but he did have the most important role. (Don't count roy) We'll revisit D2 if we're alive.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 4:46:20 GMT -8
reason #348 why Flux's claim was idiotic:
Scum roleblocker can block tonight and fuck his entire plan, leading to either him lying about a result or admitting the no result. Either way will probably end in lynch.
Fuck Flux.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 4:52:42 GMT -8
reason #348 why Flux's claim was idiotic: Scum roleblocker can block tonight and fuck his entire plan, leading to either him lying about a result or admitting the no result. Either way will probably end in lynch. Fuck Flux. Yeah that's the real problem. Scum don't need to kill him since they almost certainly have a way to negate his power.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 4:53:41 GMT -8
reason #348 why Flux's claim was idiotic: Scum roleblocker can block tonight and fuck his entire plan, leading to either him lying about a result or admitting the no result. Either way will probably end in lynch. Fuck Flux. Yeah that's the real problem. Scum don't need to kill him since they almost certainly have a way to negate his power. And I find it hard to believe he didn't consider this. I look forward to him claiming he's inexperienced again if/when someone questions it.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 5:30:51 GMT -8
Should I bring it up?
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 5:37:33 GMT -8
eh, up to you. I did mention it early on but I don't think there's any point going back over this until we get tomorrow's results (or lack there of)
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 5:42:17 GMT -8
I dont remember you mentioning it but you're right, doesn't really seem worthwhile. It doesn't change anything.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 7:12:14 GMT -8
I don't think El Topo has found an efficient way to mafia.
|
|
Burbeting
Vice Admin
Bear of Love
The obligatory (gay) bear of the society!
|
Post by Burbeting on Feb 17, 2016 7:35:26 GMT -8
You two both are only players who have posted +100 posts already.
Conratu-donut-lations.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 8:19:31 GMT -8
If there ever was a scumtell..
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 17, 2016 9:49:03 GMT -8
Launch attacking Sophia now. That's... quite brazen, if scum.
And as with Gorlak attacking us, his arguments are very weak, does he really believe this?
Not sure what to think
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 17, 2016 10:27:21 GMT -8
yeah that whole point is weak sauce.
I'm still unsure why TimeFlux is still on the table as a lynch candidate.
Both claims are suspicious, but not enough to warrant a straight lynch yet.
|
|