|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 0:55:23 GMT -8
Gorlak with the stunning contribution. What did you think of Hyper using the 'lynch as punishment' point? Also ignoring the fact that claiming miller straight off isn't a particularly bad play if true. I hated it, too many people this game pushing lynches without being clear if its policy of sincere. "Bad play" on its own is not a scumtell.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 1:04:03 GMT -8
I don't feel good about El Panda at all.
El Topo has pratically ignored the trackers. I'll go through his posts but he made very little comment on it and has instead been chasing TimeFlux for the bad play, and I'm still unsure if he actually thinks there's scum there.
Giant Panda's attempt at defending Blawl is also worthy enough to now see how Blawl flips.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 1:08:37 GMT -8
sorry lover, did their work for them.
I'm sure they'd have attacked me for not looking for it instead.
Yeah, That contradicts Kawl's statement in my eyes. Unlimted vs X-shot is a conflict.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 1:09:30 GMT -8
I'd also say it's more likely scum would have unlimited tracking as opposed to x shot.
That's not based on anything but scum are minority, so their powers would be more potent.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 1:13:23 GMT -8
El Topo's only opinion on Trackers:
The problem I have with Blarg being scum is that...his original role claim seems downright insane if he is scum (but Flux is not).
I don't agree with this, the original claim is bold, but it's not insane.
Before that he only says leaving known PRs that can retrieve information alive is stupid for scum to do.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 3:23:41 GMT -8
Kawl seems to have ignored the soft sleepwalker claim info.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 3:29:25 GMT -8
Our role would definitely fit for a unlimited scum tracker counter, right?
It makes more sense against Kark's x-shot
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 3:30:01 GMT -8
more sense then being countered against Kark's x-shot.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 3:51:49 GMT -8
We both know how astute and intelligent Blarg is.
For this reason, I am starting to think him dropping his 'chat name' was actually a clever drop to pretend hes town.
Burb made it clear scum knows how the chats work.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 3:59:35 GMT -8
Our role would definitely fit for a unlimited scum tracker counter, right? It makes more sense against Kark's x-shot It fits, but I wouldn't be anywhere near that confident in it.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 4:01:08 GMT -8
We both know how astute and intelligent Blarg is. For this reason, I am starting to think him dropping his 'chat name' was actually a clever drop to pretend hes town. Burb made it clear scum knows how the chats work. Yeah I guess that must be the case. It's just weird that everything else about lover chats is in the OP, but Burb gave them the title separately? It was definitely a hint that Blarg wanted people to see anyway.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 4:03:08 GMT -8
Well think about it, it was a reasonable slip that could actually find all scum or at least some.
It would be a bit of a danger not to give it. I assume it was mentioned in the scum chat in his opening message.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 4:19:58 GMT -8
you're welcome to use that gif, bear. Anytime.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 4:20:16 GMT -8
#there4uluv
|
|
Burbeting
Vice Admin
Bear of Love
The obligatory (gay) bear of the society!
|
Post by Burbeting on Feb 23, 2016 4:20:47 GMT -8
Might save it for some fluff.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 5:03:47 GMT -8
why does ty think we lose both in a night of no kills?
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 5:10:08 GMT -8
kingkittys reads are interesting. He doesn't think Blawl flipping scum helps our alignment, which I find hard to believe because we've been going at them for most of the day.
he also wants kark dead as opposed to blawl. Which is because......claiming miller tracker is bold?
He doesn't give a reason why he believes kark to be scum
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 5:11:19 GMT -8
why does ty think we lose both in a night of no kills? I think he means one lynched and the other killed? Kark has been discussing that
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 5:21:06 GMT -8
well whoever saved us last night would go for kark tonight you'd hope
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 6:01:27 GMT -8
I don't really like Magnum and how he just seems to pop up when hes mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 6:02:31 GMT -8
Lol Launch
That's bait, I'd ignore it
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 6:03:08 GMT -8
I don't really like Magnum and how he just seems to pop up when hes mentioned. Thinking exactly the same, he's done that before hasn't he?
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 6:07:58 GMT -8
launch is an idiot. A big idiot
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 6:08:31 GMT -8
I also didnt see your advice before replying.
damn it.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 7:35:11 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 7:36:09 GMT -8
Jesus Kark is aware he could just take a break from the thread or something.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 7:40:08 GMT -8
Yeah I agree, add it to the list. El Topo is riding high on my scumread detector right now, but that's always the case. Kitty's thoughts actually made me a bit more suspicious of batboy. I believe we should focus on the scumhalf not the townhalf.
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 7:47:18 GMT -8
Don't agree with Hyper. They've claimed Miller, if they are scum then trying to save him seems really stupid.
It's why I think the players not planning on voting for blawl are scum, not ones defending him. Except Panda who sort of tried.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Feb 23, 2016 7:54:42 GMT -8
Don't agree with Hyper. They've claimed Miller, if they are scum then trying to save him seems really stupid. It's why I think the players not planning on voting for blawl are scum, not ones defending him. Except Panda who sort of tried. Isnt that what Hyper said?
|
|
|
Post by cabot on Feb 23, 2016 7:56:05 GMT -8
Is it?
I'm trying to remember how to deploy an application at the same time here, oops.
|
|