|
|
Post by xamtheking on Jan 30, 2016 15:54:52 GMT -8
I have no idea what the fuck is going on
Are we YuGiOh now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 30, 2016 15:55:19 GMT -8
The Tanner's wife should be able to tell us if the Tanner card is still at the center—if it is—though. I don't believe that's the case. They see who would have started with the tanner card. They don't know about switches. Oh Kawl Kawl Kawl Kawl Vote: Kawl |
|
|
|
Post by FluxWaveZ on Jan 30, 2016 15:55:25 GMT -8
Well, I don't know when the Tanner's Wife gets the report on who her husband is (either during the Night when they get their Role PM or as the Day starts with a second Role PM), but my point is that if the Tanner isn't actually an active role right now, the Tanner's wife would know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 30, 2016 15:56:46 GMT -8
I told you he was a wolf
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 16:06:15 GMT -8
Well, I don't know when the Tanner's Wife gets the report on who her husband is (either during the Night when they get their Role PM or as the Day starts with a second Role PM), but my point is that if the Tanner isn't actually an active role right now, the Tanner's wife would know. They get alerted 3rd or 4th, it's in the second post. And they would have known if it started in play or not. But if it was later switched by the witch for example they would not know that. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 16:11:50 GMT -8
I don't believe that's the case. They see who would have started with the tanner card. They don't know about switches. Oh Kawl Kawl Kawl Kawl Vote: Kawl That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. |
|
|
|
Post by FluxWaveZ on Jan 30, 2016 16:13:22 GMT -8
Well, I don't know when the Tanner's Wife gets the report on who her husband is (either during the Night when they get their Role PM or as the Day starts with a second Role PM), but my point is that if the Tanner isn't actually an active role right now, the Tanner's wife would know. They get alerted 3rd or 4th, it's in the second post. And they would have known if it started in play or not. But if it was later switched by the witch for example they would not know that. Oh right... my own role confused me on alert order. More on that later, I guess. I see. So if the Tanner was at the center, the Tanner's Wife would at least have been alerted there was no Tanner in play at the time, but that also doesn't mean there isn't a Tanner at play right now. Wonder if it'd be in the best interest for the Tanner's Wife to tell us that there was no Tanner at that time, then. |
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 30, 2016 16:13:40 GMT -8
Oh Kawl Kawl Kawl Kawl Vote: Kawl That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. Stop stalling and fake a role claim for us to disprove, wolfie |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Jan 30, 2016 16:15:55 GMT -8
Not just wait until 30 minutes before the deadline and then claim for real! Works every time! Stop giving out our super secret ONUW playbook. Sorry. :( There are so many first-time ONUW players and I just wanted to help them out. Apprentice Seer checking in, saw Tanner card in position 3. The Tanner Dream is dead. Long Live the Tanner. also you're a liar I have no idea what the fuck is going on Are we YuGiOh now? Yes and now you've fallen for my trap card. >:) |
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 30, 2016 16:15:56 GMT -8
They get alerted 3rd or 4th, it's in the second post. And they would have known if it started in play or not. But if it was later switched by the witch for example they would not know that. Oh right... my own role confused me on alert order. More on that later, I guess. I see. So if the Tanner was at the center, the Tanner's Wife would at least have been alerted there was no Tanner in play at the time, but that also doesn't mean there isn't a Tanner at play right now. Wonder if it'd be in the best interest for the Tanner's Wife to tell us that there was no Tanner at that time, then. I think the wife is village aligned when no Tanner is in play. So if the witch+drunk didn't touch card 3, wifey can claim Is that right, Sorian? |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 16:16:21 GMT -8
They get alerted 3rd or 4th, it's in the second post. And they would have known if it started in play or not. But if it was later switched by the witch for example they would not know that. Oh right... my own role confused me on alert order. More on that later, I guess. I see. So if the Tanner was at the center, the Tanner's Wife would at least have been alerted there was no Tanner in play at the time, but that also doesn't mean there isn't a Tanner at play right now. Wonder if it'd be in the best interest for the Tanner's Wife to tell us that there was no Tanner at that time, then. Right, that's correct and is also the correct question to be asking if you were TW. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 16:17:32 GMT -8
Oh right... my own role confused me on alert order. More on that later, I guess. I see. So if the Tanner was at the center, the Tanner's Wife would at least have been alerted there was no Tanner in play at the time, but that also doesn't mean there isn't a Tanner at play right now. Wonder if it'd be in the best interest for the Tanner's Wife to tell us that there was no Tanner at that time, then. I think the wife is village aligned when no Tanner is in play. So if the witch+drunk didn't touch card 3, wifey can claim Is that right, Sorian? Waifu is village aligned if the card ultimately ends up in the middle. But yea it depends on whether card 3 was touched. |
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Jan 30, 2016 16:20:53 GMT -8
Claiming Sorian?
That's bold. I like it.
But if you're really Sorian, tell me... what's my role?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Jan 30, 2016 16:28:24 GMT -8
Oh right... my own role confused me on alert order. More on that later, I guess. I see. So if the Tanner was at the center, the Tanner's Wife would at least have been alerted there was no Tanner in play at the time, but that also doesn't mean there isn't a Tanner at play right now. Wonder if it'd be in the best interest for the Tanner's Wife to tell us that there was no Tanner at that time, then. I think the wife is village aligned when no Tanner is in play. So if the witch+drunk didn't touch card 3, wifey can claim Is that right, Sorian? If there is a Tanner in play right now then Tanner and Wife are a team. If the Tanner is in the center right now then the Wife is village aligned. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 16:29:33 GMT -8
Claiming Sorian? That's bold. I like it. But if you're really Sorian, tell me... what's my role? I mean if it's in the opening three posts I figure it's fair game to post as confirmed. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 16:30:49 GMT -8
Stop giving out our super secret ONUW playbook. Sorry.  There are so many first-time ONUW players and I just wanted to help them out. Apprentice Seer checking in, saw Tanner card in position 3. The Tanner Dream is dead. Long Live the Tanner. also you're a liar I have no idea what the fuck is going on Are we YuGiOh now? Yes and now you've fallen for my trap card. >  So you know that mazre is lying about seeing tanner under card 3? |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Jan 30, 2016 16:46:50 GMT -8
So Mazre, what are you really?
We're all friends here, there is no need to lie like that.
|
|
|
|
Post by riorius on Jan 30, 2016 18:33:18 GMT -8
Alright, everyone hold on to something, 'cause I'm about to tell you everything I know. Minds will be blown, so I hope y'all are ready.
When the night began, I was a Villager.
*mic drop*
|
|
|
|
Post by cornb on Jan 30, 2016 19:01:25 GMT -8
Do we know the priority for night actions?
|
|
|
|
Post by FluxWaveZ on Jan 30, 2016 19:03:10 GMT -8
Do we know the priority for night actions? It's all in the second post. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 19:29:26 GMT -8
Do we know the priority for night actions? Care to share what you got up to last night? |
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Jan 30, 2016 19:32:42 GMT -8
Just dropping the timer in, will also update the 4th post.  |
|
|
|
Post by cornb on Jan 30, 2016 19:41:27 GMT -8
Do we know the priority for night actions? Care to share what you got up to last night? Not first and not last. |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Jan 30, 2016 20:05:15 GMT -8
 Didn't think everyone would have such cold feet. Maybe this can kick start things. I'm the Witch, I switched someone's card with a card from the center. The card I picked was Card #2, the Apprentice Seer, and I gave it to Not-Mazre. Even if I had given it to Mazre he would have no knowledge of this switch and he would not have been able to use the ability, aka he is lying about his card and what he saw. I know who I gave this Seer card to but I'm not ready to give up that info just yet. ;) So, yeah, Mazre is super lying. Probably isn't the Mystic Wolf tho as they can only look at a Person's card and not a Center card ( Sorian please confirm?? ) so why lie over a center card when they had good info to start. |
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Jan 30, 2016 20:08:27 GMT -8
Mystic Wolf tho as they can only look at a Person's card and not a Center card ( Sorian please confirm?? )
Mystic Wolf: The mystic wolf will wake up next and be allowed to view one player's role. The mystic wolf is aligned with the wolves.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 20:09:06 GMT -8
Care to share what you got up to last night? Not first and not last. referring to when you will claim or saying that you were neither the insomniac nor the doppelgänger? |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 20:15:45 GMT -8
Alternatively, saying you saw tanner is a pretty safe play as even if it's in play they wont say anything. So I'm not convinced on the non wolfie nature of Mazre.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Jan 30, 2016 20:26:24 GMT -8
Thank you Sorian. :D Alternatively, saying you saw tanner is a pretty safe play as even if it's in play they wont say anything. So I'm not convinced on the non wolfie nature of Mazre. True, it's not like a Tanner is going to go and contradict them. Just because I don't think Mazre might be the Mystic Wolf doesn't mean I don't think he is a Wolf in general lol. The only people who gain anything from lying in this game are the Wolves and Tanner Family, both anti-Town, and seeing as Mazre is lying he fits somewhere in there. |
|
|
|
Post by Kawl on Jan 30, 2016 20:32:54 GMT -8
Thank you Sorian.  Alternatively, saying you saw tanner is a pretty safe play as even if it's in play they wont say anything. So I'm not convinced on the non wolfie nature of Mazre. True, it's not like a Tanner is going to go and contradict them. Just because I don't think Mazre might be the Mystic Wolf doesn't mean I don't think he is a Wolf in general lol. The only people who gain anything from lying in this game are the Wolves and Tanner Family, both anti-Town, and seeing as Mazre is lying he fits somewhere in there. eh I'd disagree with that. Lying can be an easy way to fish out information from those who are anti town too. If everyone is straight up honest the game is a lot less fun IMO. |
|
|
|
Post by Sawneeks on Jan 30, 2016 20:42:06 GMT -8
Thank you Sorian. :D True, it's not like a Tanner is going to go and contradict them. Just because I don't think Mazre might be the Mystic Wolf doesn't mean I don't think he is a Wolf in general lol. The only people who gain anything from lying in this game are the Wolves and Tanner Family, both anti-Town, and seeing as Mazre is lying he fits somewhere in there. eh I'd disagree with that. Lying can be an easy way to fish out information from those who are anti town too. If everyone is straight up honest the game is a lot less fun IMO. I hope Mazre comes back and says he was trying to fish out the Tanner. |
|
