|
Post by Sorian on Dec 30, 2015 19:10:51 GMT -8
Why does everyone just automatically assume that a second killer is a neutral?
Every kill has been in line with town's interests and your win condition has nothing to do with neutrals and yet I see no one entertaining the thought of a vig.
smh
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Dec 30, 2015 19:44:36 GMT -8
if there was an sk, it would've been mentioned in town's win condition
they need only look at my flip, which specifically mentions neutrals
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Dec 31, 2015 1:33:54 GMT -8
Remember how Retro made that end of the day post about you being wrong? That was great. Unlike a certain windows phone peddler. I wonder how long it'll take before people start commenting on Blarg acting like Blarg, and treating it as a scumtell. Which still makes me laugh. He was well aware that who I lynched that day wasn't super important (though I did think you were the other neutral). And hey, I 100% tried to side with town in NX. And if I had, I would have lost. So no regrets.
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 31, 2015 7:21:35 GMT -8
RIP Final Fantasy Mafia, 2015-2015
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Dec 31, 2015 8:48:40 GMT -8
RIP Final Fantasy Mafia, 2015-2015 Lol, I seriously forgot this game was in it's day phase XD
|
|
|
Post by theawesomepossum on Dec 31, 2015 12:13:14 GMT -8
I find it funny that Launchpad briefly entertained the idea of me being the one killed by mafia and Darryl being killed by neutral. Then he realized mafia would have no motive to kill me lol.
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 31, 2015 12:22:26 GMT -8
I'm glad he basically realized in the same sentence how horrible of a theory that was. I was going to get annoyed if they actually wasted time giving that topic the time of day. Though I guess that would be better than all of the 0 discussion they have going on now.
|
|
|
Post by zippedpinhead on Dec 31, 2015 14:07:05 GMT -8
Can someone send me a link to the latest page of the game thread?
Something is up with my internet at home, I am only able to see the last post as one from launch quoting blarg from yesterday...
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Dec 31, 2015 14:27:42 GMT -8
Can someone send me a link to the latest page of the game thread? Something is up with my internet at home, I am only able to see the last post as one from launch quoting blarg from yesterday...
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 31, 2015 14:29:19 GMT -8
Can someone send me a link to the latest page of the game thread? Something is up with my internet at home, I am only able to see the last post as one from launch quoting blarg from yesterday... Oh man, not sure what's up, it's been 3 day phases since then
|
|
|
Post by crimsonfist on Dec 31, 2015 14:50:07 GMT -8
Oh wow, activity.
Anyone want to bet on how long until the next post?
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Dec 31, 2015 15:34:30 GMT -8
Its 2016, I am drunk and the thread is still as dead as Burb on night 1. Good times.
|
|
Burbeting
Vice Admin
Bear of Love
The obligatory (gay) bear of the society!
|
Post by Burbeting on Dec 31, 2015 16:21:36 GMT -8
Its 2016, I am drunk and the thread is still as dead as Burb on night 1. Good times. Oy, It's night 2! New Years resolution: survive for longer time
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Dec 31, 2015 16:24:21 GMT -8
Its 2016, I am drunk and the thread is still as dead as Burb on night 1. Good times. Oy, It's night 2! New Years resolution: survive for longer time Don't make new years resolutions you can't keep you silly bear. *hugs Burb *
|
|
Burbeting
Vice Admin
Bear of Love
The obligatory (gay) bear of the society!
|
Post by Burbeting on Dec 31, 2015 16:37:04 GMT -8
Oy, It's night 2! New Years resolution: survive for longer time Don't make new years resolutions you can't keep you silly bear. *hugs Burb * Even a hug makes this thread more active than the one where people are shouting who to lynch.
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Dec 31, 2015 16:40:19 GMT -8
Don't make new years resolutions you can't keep you silly bear. *hugs Burb * Even a hug makes this thread more active than the one where people are shouting who to lynch. May be they all need hugs? *of to give them hugs*
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Dec 31, 2015 18:03:28 GMT -8
Extension sounds good to me
At this rate, spec thread is gonna have more posts than the main thread
|
|
|
Post by zippedpinhead on Dec 31, 2015 18:31:21 GMT -8
I almost posted that in the game thread, but I wasn't sure how appreciated it would be in light of the season 4 review thread
|
|
|
Post by crimsonfist on Dec 31, 2015 19:28:38 GMT -8
It's not like the people playing are using the thread for anything though.
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Dec 31, 2015 19:54:32 GMT -8
I almost posted that in the game thread, but I wasn't sure how appreciated it would be in light of the season 4 review thread You're more polite than I am apparently >_> I think what is frowned upon is reactions to the lynch before said lynch is revealed.
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Dec 31, 2015 20:04:24 GMT -8
I almost posted that in the game thread, but I wasn't sure how appreciated it would be in light of the season 4 review thread You're more polite than I am apparently >_> I think what is frowned upon is reactions to the lynch before said lynch is revealed. unless you're seath and you consistently will post popcorn gigs for the end of the day
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Dec 31, 2015 20:10:44 GMT -8
"What, blarg have a role you guys want to see in action? I'm onto you retro Then it's decided, we ABSORB blarg night one Retroplsrespond #sickreads
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Dec 31, 2015 20:20:31 GMT -8
sooo
uh
I just realized something
asides from avoiding a redundant strong kill + big kill, there was 0 reason for xam's power to be immune to pop's
|
|
|
Post by Retro on Jan 1, 2016 7:03:48 GMT -8
"What, blarg have a role you guys want to see in action? I'm onto you retro Then it's decided, we ABSORB blarg night one Retroplsrespond #sickreads Eh? Oh. Well, yeah, it was a combination of the two things. One the one hand, yes, Blarg did have a role we wanted to see in action. But more than that, Scrafty and I agreed that deciding to kill someone on night one based on their previous gameplay BEFORE day one has even begun is poor form, no matter who it is or what role they have. As I said in Scum chat, at least let day one play out before you make a decision. I'd be lying if I said that Blarg's role had nothing to do with it, but I would have done it for any player in the game. It's just fairness. Anyway, Scrafty commented to me that she was having trouble trying to find a way to say all that nicely, so I stepped in and did it. Also: I believe the reason for wanting to kill Blarg was because he takes up so much of the players' attention, but that is ENTIRELY in Scum's favor. The more people pay attention to him, the less they pay attention to you. Killing Sorian (the other potential target, IIRC,) on night one would make way more sense, because he drives discussion (which is anti-scum) and people inexplicably seem to follow his lead. If I were scum in a game with Blarg and Sorian, step one would be to let Blarg do his thing, and step two would be to either get Sorian's trust so you can use him against the town, or just kill him outright. (Have we ever seen Scum!Blarg? I really want to see that now.)
|
|
|
Post by Retro on Jan 1, 2016 7:11:23 GMT -8
Note: I am not blind to the hypocrisy of the above post.
|
|
|
Post by Hyperactivity on Jan 1, 2016 8:17:55 GMT -8
Retroplsrespond #sickreads Eh? Oh. Well, yeah, it was a combination of the two things. One the one hand, yes, Blarg did have a role we wanted to see in action. But more than that, Scrafty and I agreed that deciding to kill someone on night one based on their previous gameplay BEFORE day one has even begun is poor form, no matter who it is or what role they have. As I said in Scum chat, at least let day one play out before you make a decision. I'd be lying if I said that Blarg's role had nothing to do with it, but I would have done it for any player in the game. It's just fairness. Anyway, Scrafty commented to me that she was having trouble trying to find a way to say all that nicely, so I stepped in and did it. Also: I believe the reason for wanting to kill Blarg was because he takes up so much of the players' attention, but that is ENTIRELY in Scum's favor. The more people pay attention to him, the less they pay attention to you. Killing Sorian (the other potential target, IIRC,) on night one would make way more sense, because he drives discussion (which is anti-scum) and people inexplicably seem to follow his lead. If I were scum in a game with Blarg and Sorian, step one would be to let Blarg do his thing, and step two would be to either get Sorian's trust so you can use him against the town, or just kill him outright. (Have we ever seen Scum!Blarg? I really want to see that now.) oh dear, retro.... it was always a joke, I was never seriously going to consider it, and you seem to have spent a lot of time on something I always intended as s throwaway idea
|
|
|
Post by Sorian on Jan 1, 2016 8:28:44 GMT -8
I look forward to many night 1 deaths coming my way D:
|
|
|
Post by Roytheone on Jan 1, 2016 9:17:42 GMT -8
Retroplsrespond #sickreads Eh? Oh. Well, yeah, it was a combination of the two things. One the one hand, yes, Blarg did have a role we wanted to see in action. But more than that, Scrafty and I agreed that deciding to kill someone on night one based on their previous gameplay BEFORE day one has even begun is poor form, no matter who it is or what role they have. As I said in Scum chat, at least let day one play out before you make a decision. I'd be lying if I said that Blarg's role had nothing to do with it, but I would have done it for any player in the game. It's just fairness. Anyway, Scrafty commented to me that she was having trouble trying to find a way to say all that nicely, so I stepped in and did it. Also: I believe the reason for wanting to kill Blarg was because he takes up so much of the players' attention, but that is ENTIRELY in Scum's favor. The more people pay attention to him, the less they pay attention to you. Killing Sorian (the other potential target, IIRC,) on night one would make way more sense, because he drives discussion (which is anti-scum) and people inexplicably seem to follow his lead. If I were scum in a game with Blarg and Sorian, step one would be to let Blarg do his thing, and step two would be to either get Sorian's trust so you can use him against the town, or just kill him outright. (Have we ever seen Scum!Blarg? I really want to see that now.) We let Blarg live N1 in HP, and the following day he completely broke the game in favour of town by outing voldermort very quickly So yeah, letting Blarg live as scum isn't always the best idea
|
|
|
Post by Bombay on Jan 1, 2016 9:46:39 GMT -8
this inactivity should be (and is likely) a scumtell that mafia are in no danger but instead it's hand waved becuz "new years"
|
|
|
Post by Retro on Jan 1, 2016 10:08:35 GMT -8
oh dear, retro.... it was always a joke, I was never seriously going to consider it, and you seem to have spent a lot of time on something I always intended as s throwaway ideaI wouldn't flatter yourself too hard, Hyper. This conversation comes up somewhere in nearly every game Blarg plays in. I've had a while to consider the position, including a game where I played AS Blarg. A lot of people love his antics. (I do.) A lot of people don't. It's an ongoing situation. Personally, I think people should let Blarg be Blarg, Let Scrafty be Scrafty, and let Retro be Retro. Good to know you weren't seriously considering it, though. I look forward to many night 1 deaths coming my way D: If it helps, I'm sure I'm not the first person who's thought of it. I might not even be the first person who has actually said it. It's the dark side of that magnetic personality of yours. We let Blarg live N1 in HP, and the following day he completely broke the game in favour of town by outing voldermort very quickly So yeah, letting Blarg live as scum isn't always the best idea That's true. Blarg as a Neutral in Gafia might be the most apt descriptor.
|
|