|
Post by Splinter on Aug 15, 2016 23:05:44 GMT -8
Damned if we do, damned if we don't, basically
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Aug 15, 2016 23:56:00 GMT -8
Shit what if WAMD has the Xbox? That slip would them be real, and she was going hardest on Blarg purely for his original lie.
In that case I just hope it isn't a cop shot :/
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 16, 2016 1:35:21 GMT -8
In response to Splints request to roleplay, if I knew all the contestants were town:
1) Hunt down the winner, hope that the prize is not an immunity. Kill Kawl because his 2usd comment seems the most likely to be a lie in hindsight. Killing CM wouldn't be out of the question though, since she did not mention her bid at all. 2) Ignore the contestants because the prize could be a immunity and there could be doctors protecting the contestants. The classic conservative safe as fuck Kyan is scum play.
|
|
|
Post by Christina Mackenzie on Aug 16, 2016 1:37:22 GMT -8
Kawl did go back on saying he bid for the item.
WAMD's slip, now that you mentioned it, there is a possibility. That would mean Kawl was lying about his bid. Only Blarg and Kawl came forward before WAMD posted about the last contestant.
If we hit WAMD and she has the Xbox then we'll know Kawl was lying but town will grill the 3 of us on Day 2.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 16, 2016 1:44:42 GMT -8
Going for the contestants is risky but I'd be open for it. Obviously I now talk about killing Kawl. If we get him and he has the item, we learn how dangerous they are and how much we should focus on the contestants. This also means that town would learn some of this as well, one of the dangers as the nature of the prizes will either strengthen or weaken the "everybobby is a ordinary" theory. And obviously in this case we should get rid of the item, if Kawl did not use it. If he did, we stand a chance to get rid of the information provided by the item.
If he does not have the item, somebody else won it, or a fringe case exists where some items can be transferred grrrr. Again, we learn something. We put more focus on the two remaining contestants, one of you two would have to be the claimed winner in this case, dunno if you should say it though. We learn that the prize is essentially lost to us, while town thinks one of the claimed contestants has it. The actual winner challenges us if we claim to have the prize, 1-1 is bad so no claim I guess.
Obviously, there is a chance Kawl would be protected/watched/whatevered. In town's eyes that is close to a 1/3 pick so I'd not be that concerned about this in the grand scheme of things. It really is, do we wanna play bold or conservative?
|
|
|
Post by Christina Mackenzie on Aug 16, 2016 1:47:02 GMT -8
Also Kark mentioned something about the mathematics of starting with an even number of players and the possibility of multiple NKs. Given our win condition to make up at least half of the players alive at the START of a day phase, I believe it gives it more weight. Maybe the items give players to carry out the kills or there are already out there to start.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 16, 2016 1:48:04 GMT -8
Option: dragonz is a chaotic and unexpected one indeed. If she has the item, town should be able to figure out that we had insider info because we ignored the contestants. If she does not have it, it might be the better scenario for us. We then know Kawl should have it and it does not make the insider info concrete in town's eyes I think.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 16, 2016 1:57:08 GMT -8
I think I am actually fine with any kill, bold or conservative.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Aug 16, 2016 2:17:00 GMT -8
Dragonz is a bad kill. She's a near-guaranteed lynch, reveals we had insider info like you said, and reveals the D1 lynch as town v town making it already worthless.
My only worry is that she's now a cop in which case I'm already dead.gif
But we can't gamble on that, just have to hope it isn't the case.
I think targetting outside of the contestants is even more suspicious than finding the item, so I'm back on the Kawl train.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 16, 2016 2:26:17 GMT -8
Fine points about dragonz.
|
|
|
Post by cornb on Aug 16, 2016 5:26:08 GMT -8
I would kill Lone Prodigy. LP has been right more often than not though. And he's not a usual N1 pick So?
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Aug 16, 2016 5:35:27 GMT -8
LP has been right more often than not though. And he's not a usual N1 pick So? LP probably isn't a PR and isn't a leader, he only dies early when he's on the right track. I know you can rely on town to ignore that and get away with it most times, but it's a risk. In this case we have potential PRs to look at, so targetting outside of those raises even more questions than usual.
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Aug 16, 2016 13:05:28 GMT -8
What do?
|
|
|
Post by Sophia on Aug 16, 2016 14:53:32 GMT -8
Reminder that I lock night actions two hours before the start, and that you can submit your kill here or in PMs.
20 hours left
|
|
|
Post by Christina Mackenzie on Aug 16, 2016 18:21:36 GMT -8
My worry is if we hit Kawl and he doesn't have the item, scum's next targets would obviously be CornBurrito and myself. Since neither of us will be NK it could go either way, town may suspect we're scum or just too obvious a target for doctors/watchers. I'm not sure if WAMD will be lynched the next day, no one seems to pay much heed to her slip up. Do you think we can use that against those who mentioned giving her a pass? It could look like scum were trying to weaken your claim so they can hit her at night. Worst case would be for her to admit she had the item if she was close to being lynched. Also if we manage to hit someone with an item, town will ask that all contestants keep quiet for the remaining days. wherearemahdragonz (4)
*splinter 153 ( 350) blargonaut 365kyanrute 423 ( 534) melonrabbit 523*splinter 544nin1000 555 blargonaut (6)sawneeks 307dusk soldier 333wherearemahdragonz 336*splinter 350 ( 501) kawl_usc 454starsketch 524kalor 530 These are the other most active posters. Karkador melonrabbit Sawneeks StarSketch Are any of them possible N1 targets?
|
|
|
Post by Splinter on Aug 16, 2016 23:22:41 GMT -8
Kark? There's not much reason to hit him, but not much downside either. It would also stop me from getting into stupid arguments with him.
Plus it would look like we're afraid of his override teasing.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 0:20:34 GMT -8
kawl good kill so is all seeing evil cat
|
|
|
Post by Christina Mackenzie on Aug 17, 2016 0:31:47 GMT -8
Between Kawl and Kark, I'd pick Kawl. His override stunt almost feels like bait.
|
|
|
Post by Christina Mackenzie on Aug 17, 2016 6:23:42 GMT -8
Have we decided who to target tonight?
|
|
|
Post by Sophia on Aug 17, 2016 6:36:15 GMT -8
Psst, hey guys. You have four hours left. Might want to submit a kill.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 7:24:05 GMT -8
no
we are peaceful hippies
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 7:25:39 GMT -8
Kill: Kawl_USC
Override if you feel Kawlie is too risky or somethings.
|
|
|
Post by Sophia on Aug 17, 2016 7:31:48 GMT -8
Command received.
If you guys decide on another kill target before then, you can change it before the two hour lock.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 9:06:31 GMT -8
test post pls ignore
|
|
|
Post by Retro on Aug 17, 2016 9:19:40 GMT -8
Kyan just called to my attention that your posts in here were increasing your post counts. This has been corrected.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 9:20:18 GMT -8
another testes post much ignore
|
|
|
Post by Sophia on Aug 17, 2016 11:42:25 GMT -8
another testes post much ignore Kyan please check your GAF PMs.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 11:47:19 GMT -8
nuuu a spooky chat
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 11:51:35 GMT -8
Aka I have been invited to a mason's chat with Sawneeks.
|
|
|
Post by kyanrute on Aug 17, 2016 11:57:44 GMT -8
And I perhaps should mention that the chat's name is Xbox LIVE Voice Chat. hmmmmmmmm. interesting.
|
|