I honestly didn't read that part either and had to go recheck the thing to even see it. So I could have made the same mistake. But also I didn't make a post about it that was like "I'm in the dark like everyone else! Right buddies! ...right?"

Given that Day 1 is a crapfest, it's certainly something reasonable to start from.

Vote: XamTheKing

Could you possibly post more fluff?

The roles not being RNG is the only way that the story you're claiming makes any sense. You've said your role involved dying and resurrecting. If that was the actual function of your role, and it publicly mod dying on day 1, it makes Rule 34 a blatantly unfair thing to be in the game. It would've let you claim "oh, ha ha Splinter was just joking, I'm just normal!" Since you have a reputation in the community it doesn't seem that odd for a rule specifically about you to be there.

If a good portion of the 29 other players got that role such a rule wouldn't have made any sense. Like if it was "34) Ultron will be mod killed unless he does *thing*" it would've stood out like a sore thumb and I wouldn't have been able to pass it off as a joke. That makes me think that the only way your role would function as you claim it does would be for you to have specifically got assigned the role instead of everyone getting everything randomly.

Even if this is a super bastard game I'm pretty sure that we aren't playing games where special GAFia celebrities get special roles just for them, because that's against the basic tenets of Mafia as a game. The only remaining reasonable option in my mind is that your whole story is nonsense.

Your other two examples are things that got cleared up very quickly that don't give anyone any advantage. Just like you getting funny haha killed for an hour would have (which is what I think actually happened).

That's very different from getting a plausible cover to disguise what you claim is supposed to be a public role.

Sorry for engaging with the most interesting claim of the day so far.

My explanation was right there with the vote. Don't need a bunch of extra nothing posts from Xam in a 30 person game. I'll probably change it tomorrow.

Ah, my bad on that.

Ridli's new player stuff being a fabrication makes the apparent rage claim also really ring false to me. Someone who suggests enough experience to say "I actually think we can break this game with a mass claim, but ive hated winning that way in past games" suggests enough experience to know not to claim like that, were one actually town.

But yeah, we can let him stay as the top candidate for awhile and talk through the rest of the day.

Xam remain quite high on my list after that claim for no reason. Can't think why a townie would do that, but it might make sense for Scum to preempt stuff in that manner and use the towns panic to find scum after the massacre to skate by without taking what many would see as a policy lynch.

Lol. Everyone that we've seen a flip for has been lying and has been town.

I guess it is possible Ridli's Medium stuff was true.

Their animals are Mouse and Chipmunk. Maybe they both got recruited by the God of Small Mammals?

Should we even lynch people anymore on the live side? Even if we hit "correctly" that just makes it more likely for them to take over the after life, which is apparently the thing that actually matters. Though I guess lynching here is the only way to kill them the first time so they can eventually be banished. Harumph.

Id rather they didn't night kill me. Since, hey, town.

Had I remembered I was gonna do a bunch of checking on Blarg and Ridli's posts since they were scum to see what they all did. Did anyone else really do that? I might've missed it. Do that if I die I guess.